<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 17:58:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1375 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à…</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1375</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1375</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1375</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-98479</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98479</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Data-In branch of iscsi_tcp_hdr_dissect() resolves the ITT to a task
and copies the PDU&amp;#39;s data segment into that command&amp;#39;s scatterlist without
asking whether the command was reading. iscsi_tcp_r2t_rsp() in the same
file does ask, and rejects an R2T for a command that is not DMA_TO_DEVICE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A target that answers a WRITE command&amp;#39;s ITT with a Data-In therefore has
the initiator write target-supplied bytes into the pages that write was
about to send. Those are the caller&amp;#39;s own pinned pages for an O_DIRECT
write, and page cache pages for a buffered one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Observed against a test target that emits one 512-byte Data-In naming a 128
KB write&amp;#39;s ITT, after the R2T for that write. With O_DIRECT the caller&amp;#39;s
buffer ends up holding 512 bytes of the target&amp;#39;s data while pwrite()
returns 131072. Buffered is quieter: pwrite() and fsync() both succeed,
nothing is logged, and reading those blocks back returns the target&amp;#39;s bytes
out of the page cache without a command going on the wire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the direction before using the scatterlist, the way the R2T path
already does.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Data-In branch of iscsi_tcp_hdr_dissect() resolves the ITT to a task
and copies the PDU&amp;#39;s data segment into that command&amp;#39;s scatterlist without
asking whether the command was reading. iscsi_tcp_r2t_rsp() in the same
file does ask, and rejects an R2T for a command that is not DMA_TO_DEVICE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A target that answers a WRITE command&amp;#39;s ITT with a Data-In therefore has
the initiator write target-supplied bytes into the pages that write was
about to send. Those are the caller&amp;#39;s own pinned pages for an O_DIRECT
write, and page cache pages for a buffered one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Observed against a test target that emits one 512-byte Data-In naming a 128
KB write&amp;#39;s ITT, after the R2T for that write. With O_DIRECT the caller&amp;#39;s
buffer ends up holding 512 bytes of the target&amp;#39;s data while pwrite()
returns 131072. Buffered is quieter: pwrite() and fsync() both succeed,
nothing is logged, and reading those blocks back returns the target&amp;#39;s bytes
out of the page cache without a command going on the wire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the direction before using the scatterlist, the way the R2T path
already does.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98479</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-m9q9-jv5w-f7p7</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-m9q9-jv5w-f7p7</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Data-In branch of iscsi_tcp_hdr_dissect() resolves the ITT to a task
and copies the PDU&amp;#39;s data segment into that command&amp;#39;s scatterlist without
asking whether the command was reading. iscsi_tcp_r2t_rsp() in the same
file does ask, and rejects an R2T for a command that is not DMA_TO_DEVICE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A target that answers a WRITE command&amp;#39;s ITT with a Data-In therefore has
the initiator write target-supplied bytes into the pages that write was
about to send. Those are the caller&amp;#39;s own pinned pages for an O_DIRECT
write, and page cache pages for a buffered one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Observed against a test target that emits one 512-byte Data-In naming a 128
KB write&amp;#39;s ITT, after the R2T for that write. With O_DIRECT the caller&amp;#39;s
buffer ends up holding 512 bytes of the target&amp;#39;s data while pwrite()
returns 131072. Buffered is quieter: pwrite() and fsync() both succeed,
nothing is logged, and reading those blocks back returns the target&amp;#39;s bytes
out of the page cache without a command going on the wire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the direction before using the scatterlist, the way the R2T path
already does.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Data-In branch of iscsi_tcp_hdr_dissect() resolves the ITT to a task
and copies the PDU&amp;#39;s data segment into that command&amp;#39;s scatterlist without
asking whether the command was reading. iscsi_tcp_r2t_rsp() in the same
file does ask, and rejects an R2T for a command that is not DMA_TO_DEVICE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A target that answers a WRITE command&amp;#39;s ITT with a Data-In therefore has
the initiator write target-supplied bytes into the pages that write was
about to send. Those are the caller&amp;#39;s own pinned pages for an O_DIRECT
write, and page cache pages for a buffered one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Observed against a test target that emits one 512-byte Data-In naming a 128
KB write&amp;#39;s ITT, after the R2T for that write. With O_DIRECT the caller&amp;#39;s
buffer ends up holding 512 bytes of the target&amp;#39;s data while pwrite()
returns 131072. Buffered is quieter: pwrite() and fsync() both succeed,
nothing is logged, and reading those blocks back returns the target&amp;#39;s bytes
out of the page cache without a command going on the wire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check the direction before using the scatterlist, the way the R2T path
already does.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-m9q9-jv5w-f7p7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98479 — scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98479</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-98479</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98479</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98479</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98479</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 248 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU The Data-In branch of iscsi_tcp_hdr_dissect() resolves the ITT to a task and copies the PDU&amp;#39;s data segment into that command&amp;#39;s scatterlist without asking whether the command was reading. iscsi_tcp_r2t_rsp() in the same file does ask, and rejects an R2T for a command that is not DMA_TO_DEVICE. A target that answers a WRITE command&amp;#39;s ITT with a Data-In therefore has the initiator write target-supplied bytes into the pages that write was about to send. Those are the caller&amp;#39;s own pinned pages for an O_DIRECT write, and page cache pages for a buffered one. Observed against a test target that emits one 512-byte Data-In naming a 128 KB write&amp;#39;s ITT, after the R2T for that write. With O_DIRECT the caller&amp;#39;s buffer ends up holding 512 bytes of the target&amp;#39;s data while pwrite() returns 131072. Buffered is quieter: pwrite() and fsync() both succeed, nothing is logged, and reading those blocks back returns the target&amp;#39;s bytes out of the page cache without a command going on the wire. Check the direction before using the scatterlist, the way the R2T path already does.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 248 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU The Data-In branch of iscsi_tcp_hdr_dissect() resolves the ITT to a task and copies the PDU&amp;#39;s data segment into that command&amp;#39;s scatterlist without asking whether the command was reading. iscsi_tcp_r2t_rsp() in the same file does ask, and rejects an R2T for a command that is not DMA_TO_DEVICE. A target that answers a WRITE command&amp;#39;s ITT with a Data-In therefore has the initiator write target-supplied bytes into the pages that write was about to send. Those are the caller&amp;#39;s own pinned pages for an O_DIRECT write, and page cache pages for a buffered one. Observed against a test target that emits one 512-byte Data-In naming a 128 KB write&amp;#39;s ITT, after the R2T for that write. With O_DIRECT the caller&amp;#39;s buffer ends up holding 512 bytes of the target&amp;#39;s data while pwrite() returns 131072. Buffered is quieter: pwrite() and fsync() both succeed, nothing is logged, and reading those blocks back returns the target&amp;#39;s bytes out of the page cache without a command going on the wire. Check the direction before using the scatterlist, the way the R2T path already does.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
