<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 20:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-84747</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-84747</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Interpretation conflict in the HTTP protocol implementation in Apache bRPC (version &amp;lt; 1.18.0) on all platforms allows remote attackers to bypass access control rules enforced by a front proxy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Root Cause:
The method dispatch function FindMethodPropertyByURI() in bRPC&amp;#39;s HTTP protocol splits the request path with a string splitter that skips empty fields, so paths containing empty path segments (consecutive slashes), such as //flags, /flags// and /flags//port, are dispatched to the same method as their collapsed form /flags. Per RFC 3986 these are distinct paths. A front proxy that enforces an ACL (e.g. blocking access to builtin services such as /flags) matches the collapsed form only, and therefore forwards the padded literal to the bRPC server, where it is dispatched as if it were the collapsed form. This differential allows //flags?setvalue= to reach a builtin service that /flags is not allowed to reach. Additionally, the HTTP/2 implementation never validated the :path pseudo-header, so requests without a :path, or with a :path that neither begins with &amp;#39;/&amp;#39; nor is the asterisk-form &amp;#39;*&amp;#39;, contrary to RFC 9113 section 8.3.1, were not rejected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Affected Scenarios:
Deployments of Apache bRPC behind a front proxy or gateway that performs access control (ACL) decisions on the literal request path, where the bRPC server accepts HTTP or HTTP/2 traffic from that proxy. In such deployments an attacker can send a path containing empty path segments to reach a resource that the front…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Interpretation conflict in the HTTP protocol implementation in Apache bRPC (version &amp;lt; 1.18.0) on all platforms allows remote attackers to bypass access control rules enforced by a front proxy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Root Cause:
The method dispatch function FindMethodPropertyByURI() in bRPC&amp;#39;s HTTP protocol splits the request path with a string splitter that skips empty fields, so paths containing empty path segments (consecutive slashes), such as //flags, /flags// and /flags//port, are dispatched to the same method as their collapsed form /flags. Per RFC 3986 these are distinct paths. A front proxy that enforces an ACL (e.g. blocking access to builtin services such as /flags) matches the collapsed form only, and therefore forwards the padded literal to the bRPC server, where it is dispatched as if it were the collapsed form. This differential allows //flags?setvalue= to reach a builtin service that /flags is not allowed to reach. Additionally, the HTTP/2 implementation never validated the :path pseudo-header, so requests without a :path, or with a :path that neither begins with &amp;#39;/&amp;#39; nor is the asterisk-form &amp;#39;*&amp;#39;, contrary to RFC 9113 section 8.3.1, were not rejected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Affected Scenarios:
Deployments of Apache bRPC behind a front proxy or gateway that performs access control (ACL) decisions on the literal request path, where the bRPC server accepts HTTP or HTTP/2 traffic from that proxy. In such deployments an attacker can send a path containing empty path segments to reach a resource that the front…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-84747</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-94r6-xp5c-qwq5</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-94r6-xp5c-qwq5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Interpretation conflict in the HTTP protocol implementation in Apache bRPC (version &amp;lt; 1.18.0) on all platforms allows remote attackers to bypass access control rules enforced by a front proxy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Root Cause:
The method dispatch function FindMethodPropertyByURI() in bRPC&amp;#39;s HTTP protocol splits the request path with a string splitter that skips empty fields, so paths containing empty path segments (consecutive slashes), such as //flags, /flags// and /flags//port, are dispatched to the same method as their collapsed form /flags. Per RFC 3986 these are distinct paths. A front proxy that enforces an ACL (e.g. blocking access to builtin services such as /flags) matches the collapsed form only, and therefore forwards the padded literal to the bRPC server, where it is dispatched as if it were the collapsed form. This differential allows //flags?setvalue= to reach a builtin service that /flags is not allowed to reach. Additionally, the HTTP/2 implementation never validated the :path pseudo-header, so requests without a :path, or with a :path that neither begins with &amp;#39;/&amp;#39; nor is the asterisk-form &amp;#39;*&amp;#39;, contrary to RFC 9113 section 8.3.1, were not rejected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Affected Scenarios:
Deployments of Apache bRPC behind a front proxy or gateway that performs access control (ACL) decisions on the literal request path, where the bRPC server accepts HTTP or HTTP/2 traffic from that proxy. In such deployments an attacker can send a path containing empty path segments to reach a resource that the front…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Interpretation conflict in the HTTP protocol implementation in Apache bRPC (version &amp;lt; 1.18.0) on all platforms allows remote attackers to bypass access control rules enforced by a front proxy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Root Cause:
The method dispatch function FindMethodPropertyByURI() in bRPC&amp;#39;s HTTP protocol splits the request path with a string splitter that skips empty fields, so paths containing empty path segments (consecutive slashes), such as //flags, /flags// and /flags//port, are dispatched to the same method as their collapsed form /flags. Per RFC 3986 these are distinct paths. A front proxy that enforces an ACL (e.g. blocking access to builtin services such as /flags) matches the collapsed form only, and therefore forwards the padded literal to the bRPC server, where it is dispatched as if it were the collapsed form. This differential allows //flags?setvalue= to reach a builtin service that /flags is not allowed to reach. Additionally, the HTTP/2 implementation never validated the :path pseudo-header, so requests without a :path, or with a :path that neither begins with &amp;#39;/&amp;#39; nor is the asterisk-form &amp;#39;*&amp;#39;, contrary to RFC 9113 section 8.3.1, were not rejected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Affected Scenarios:
Deployments of Apache bRPC behind a front proxy or gateway that performs access control (ACL) decisions on the literal request path, where the bRPC server accepts HTTP or HTTP/2 traffic from that proxy. In such deployments an attacker can send a path containing empty path segments to reach a resource that the front…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-94r6-xp5c-qwq5</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
