<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2026 06:37:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-82115</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-82115</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Missing authorization in Apache Wicket.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;org.apache.wicket.protocol.ws.api.WebSocketMessageBroadcastHandler, the request handler Wicket&amp;#39;s native WebSocket support uses to deliver an incoming frame, resolves the shared resource named by the client&amp;#39;s handshake parameter and calls WebSocketResource#onPayload() on it directly, without consulting IAuthorizationStrategy#isResourceAuthorized(). That method has a single enforcement point in the framework, org.apache.wicket.request.handler.resource.ResourceRequestHandler, which the WebSocket transport does not pass through, and WebSocketResource#respond() is final and empty. No route to a WebSocketResource therefore asks the configured authorization strategy whether the caller may use it, and an @AuthorizeResource annotation on such a class has no effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A caller needs a bound Wicket session and the name of the resource. The name is not a secret: Wicket writes it into the page that opens the connection. No page of the application is otherwise involved, because a request naming a resource is served with a throwaway page. All of the resource&amp;#39;s callbacks are reached this way, including onConnect() and both onMessage() overloads, and what a callback pushes back through WebSocketRequestHandler goes to the caller&amp;#39;s own connection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An application is affected where it registers a WebSocketResource as a shared resource and relies on the authorization strategy to restrict it. What the caller gains is whatever that resource&amp;#39;s callbacks do wi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Missing authorization in Apache Wicket.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;org.apache.wicket.protocol.ws.api.WebSocketMessageBroadcastHandler, the request handler Wicket&amp;#39;s native WebSocket support uses to deliver an incoming frame, resolves the shared resource named by the client&amp;#39;s handshake parameter and calls WebSocketResource#onPayload() on it directly, without consulting IAuthorizationStrategy#isResourceAuthorized(). That method has a single enforcement point in the framework, org.apache.wicket.request.handler.resource.ResourceRequestHandler, which the WebSocket transport does not pass through, and WebSocketResource#respond() is final and empty. No route to a WebSocketResource therefore asks the configured authorization strategy whether the caller may use it, and an @AuthorizeResource annotation on such a class has no effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A caller needs a bound Wicket session and the name of the resource. The name is not a secret: Wicket writes it into the page that opens the connection. No page of the application is otherwise involved, because a request naming a resource is served with a throwaway page. All of the resource&amp;#39;s callbacks are reached this way, including onConnect() and both onMessage() overloads, and what a callback pushes back through WebSocketRequestHandler goes to the caller&amp;#39;s own connection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An application is affected where it registers a WebSocketResource as a shared resource and relies on the authorization strategy to restrict it. What the caller gains is whatever that resource&amp;#39;s callbacks do wi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-82115</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-fcp8-rfgx-8mhm</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-fcp8-rfgx-8mhm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Missing authorization in Apache Wicket.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;org.apache.wicket.protocol.ws.api.WebSocketMessageBroadcastHandler, the request handler Wicket&amp;#39;s native WebSocket support uses to deliver an incoming frame, resolves the shared resource named by the client&amp;#39;s handshake parameter and calls WebSocketResource#onPayload() on it directly, without consulting IAuthorizationStrategy#isResourceAuthorized(). That method has a single enforcement point in the framework, org.apache.wicket.request.handler.resource.ResourceRequestHandler, which the WebSocket transport does not pass through, and WebSocketResource#respond() is final and empty. No route to a WebSocketResource therefore asks the configured authorization strategy whether the caller may use it, and an @AuthorizeResource annotation on such a class has no effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A caller needs a bound Wicket session and the name of the resource. The name is not a secret: Wicket writes it into the page that opens the connection. No page of the application is otherwise involved, because a request naming a resource is served with a throwaway page. All of the resource&amp;#39;s callbacks are reached this way, including onConnect() and both onMessage() overloads, and what a callback pushes back through WebSocketRequestHandler goes to the caller&amp;#39;s own connection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An application is affected where it registers a WebSocketResource as a shared resource and relies on the authorization strategy to restrict it. What the caller gains is whatever that resource&amp;#39;s callbacks do wi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Missing authorization in Apache Wicket.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;org.apache.wicket.protocol.ws.api.WebSocketMessageBroadcastHandler, the request handler Wicket&amp;#39;s native WebSocket support uses to deliver an incoming frame, resolves the shared resource named by the client&amp;#39;s handshake parameter and calls WebSocketResource#onPayload() on it directly, without consulting IAuthorizationStrategy#isResourceAuthorized(). That method has a single enforcement point in the framework, org.apache.wicket.request.handler.resource.ResourceRequestHandler, which the WebSocket transport does not pass through, and WebSocketResource#respond() is final and empty. No route to a WebSocketResource therefore asks the configured authorization strategy whether the caller may use it, and an @AuthorizeResource annotation on such a class has no effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A caller needs a bound Wicket session and the name of the resource. The name is not a secret: Wicket writes it into the page that opens the connection. No page of the application is otherwise involved, because a request naming a resource is served with a throwaway page. All of the resource&amp;#39;s callbacks are reached this way, including onConnect() and both onMessage() overloads, and what a callback pushes back through WebSocketRequestHandler goes to the caller&amp;#39;s own connection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An application is affected where it registers a WebSocketResource as a shared resource and relies on the authorization strategy to restrict it. What the caller gains is whatever that resource&amp;#39;s callbacks do wi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-fcp8-rfgx-8mhm</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
