<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 03:09:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1192 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans ISC BIND. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de…</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1192</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1192</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1192</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-75029</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-75029</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In a query response, an attacker may send `named` multiple copies of a record that should only exist once (such as an SOA record). If the RDATA is the same on all the copies, the record is appended to the in-memory RDATA set, which can cause increased memory usage of the negative cache and possibly lead to other memory attack vectors.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In a query response, an attacker may send `named` multiple copies of a record that should only exist once (such as an SOA record). If the RDATA is the same on all the copies, the record is appended to the in-memory RDATA set, which can cause increased memory usage of the negative cache and possibly lead to other memory attack vectors.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-75029</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-crh2-6h8j-h25c</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-crh2-6h8j-h25c</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In a query response, an attacker may send `named` multiple copies of a record that should only exist once (such as an SOA record). If the RDATA is the same on all the copies, the record is appended to the in-memory RDATA set, which can cause increased memory usage of the negative cache and possibly lead to other memory attack vectors.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In a query response, an attacker may send `named` multiple copies of a record that should only exist once (such as an SOA record). If the RDATA is the same on all the copies, the record is appended to the in-memory RDATA set, which can cause increased memory usage of the negative cache and possibly lead to other memory attack vectors.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-crh2-6h8j-h25c</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-4340 — bind security update</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/oesa-2026-4340</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3: bind&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) is an implementation of the DNS (Domain Name System) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named), which resolves host names to IP addresses; a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating properly.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a secondary zone with transfers restricted by TSIG, `named` may start to serve the data provided in a zone transfer before the final message with the TSIG signature arrives. This could allow an attacker that does not actually possess a valid TSIG signature to send unauthorized zone contents to a secondary server. Although no TSIG signature ever arrives, `named` does not rollback to the pre-transfer state. To exploit the vulnerability, the transfer must be a multi-message TCP IXFR, as described by RFC 8945.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.(CVE-2026-19033)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker may be able to cause a `named` resolver to abort. The attack requires inducing the victim resolver to send multiple queries for a DNSSEC-signed zone hosted by an authoritative server under the control of the attacker. If the auth responds with a particular sequence of crafted answers, and those answers arrive in a particular order with particular timing, the `named` resolver will encounter a use-after-free bug, and abort.
This is…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3: bind&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) is an implementation of the DNS (Domain Name System) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named), which resolves host names to IP addresses; a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating properly.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a secondary zone with transfers restricted by TSIG, `named` may start to serve the data provided in a zone transfer before the final message with the TSIG signature arrives. This could allow an attacker that does not actually possess a valid TSIG signature to send unauthorized zone contents to a secondary server. Although no TSIG signature ever arrives, `named` does not rollback to the pre-transfer state. To exploit the vulnerability, the transfer must be a multi-message TCP IXFR, as described by RFC 8945.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.(CVE-2026-19033)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker may be able to cause a `named` resolver to abort. The attack requires inducing the victim resolver to send multiple queries for a DNSSEC-signed zone hosted by an authoritative server under the control of the attacker. If the auth responds with a particular sequence of crafted answers, and those answers arrive in a particular order with particular timing, the `named` resolver will encounter a use-after-free bug, and abort.
This is…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/oesa-2026-4340</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11916-1 — bind-9.20.29-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11916-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;bind-9.20.29-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;bind-9.20.29-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11916-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:68279 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rhsa-2026:68279</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;bind: BIND: Unauthorized zone content updates via unauthenticated IXFR deltas bind9: bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via crafted DNSSEC responses bind: BIND: Denial of Service via malformed DNS64 responses bind9: bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via 16-bit length truncation in DNS negative cache handling bind: BIND: Denial of Service via invalid DNSSEC records bind9: bind: BIND 9: DNS wildcard record existence can be masked by an attacker via inapplicable NSEC records bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via crafted query responses bind: BIND: Denial of Service via TKEY query with specific configuration bind9: bind: BIND 9: DNSSEC bypass via NSEC3 insecure-referral proof bind: BIND: Remote Denial of Service via crafted DNS-over-HTTPS request bind: BIND: DNS cache poisoning via malformed zone insertion bind: BIND: Denial of Service via crafted DNSSEC reply bind: BIND resolver: Denial of Service due to resource exhaustion in SVCB/HTTPS AliasMode processing bind: BIND 9: Remote Denial of Service via cached SVCB/HTTPS AliasMode records&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;bind: BIND: Unauthorized zone content updates via unauthenticated IXFR deltas bind9: bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via crafted DNSSEC responses bind: BIND: Denial of Service via malformed DNS64 responses bind9: bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via 16-bit length truncation in DNS negative cache handling bind: BIND: Denial of Service via invalid DNSSEC records bind9: bind: BIND 9: DNS wildcard record existence can be masked by an attacker via inapplicable NSEC records bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via crafted query responses bind: BIND: Denial of Service via TKEY query with specific configuration bind9: bind: BIND 9: DNSSEC bypass via NSEC3 insecure-referral proof bind: BIND: Remote Denial of Service via crafted DNS-over-HTTPS request bind: BIND: DNS cache poisoning via malformed zone insertion bind: BIND: Denial of Service via crafted DNSSEC reply bind: BIND resolver: Denial of Service due to resource exhaustion in SVCB/HTTPS AliasMode processing bind: BIND 9: Remote Denial of Service via cached SVCB/HTTPS AliasMode records&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rhsa-2026:68279</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:24157-1 — Security update for bind</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/suse-su-2026:24157-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for bind&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for bind&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/suse-su-2026:24157-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-75029</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-75029</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: isc-dhcp, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: bind9-libs, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: bind9-libs, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: isc-dhcp and 3 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a query response, an attacker may send `named` multiple copies of a record that should only exist once (such as an SOA record). If the RDATA is the same on all the copies, the record is appended to the in-memory RDATA set, which can cause increased memory usage of the negative cache and possibly lead to other memory attack vectors. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: isc-dhcp, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: bind9-libs, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: bind9-libs, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: bind9, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: isc-dhcp and 3 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a query response, an attacker may send `named` multiple copies of a record that should only exist once (such as an SOA record). If the RDATA is the same on all the copies, the record is appended to the in-memory RDATA set, which can cause increased memory usage of the negative cache and possibly lead to other memory attack vectors. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-75029</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3420 — Internet Systems Consortium BIND: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3420</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Internet Systems Consortium BIND ausnutzen, um Daten zu manipulieren, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder Denial-of-Service-Zustände herbeizuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Internet Systems Consortium BIND ausnutzen, um Daten zu manipulieren, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder Denial-of-Service-Zustände herbeizuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
