<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2026 13:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-123818</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-123818</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. From 0.12.3 until 0.15.0, _is_safe_url validates remote media URLs with urlparse while requests.Session().get interprets backslashes differently when sending the request. An attacker can provide a URL whose validation hostname appears globally routable but whose request destination resolves to an internal host, bypassing non-global address checks. Applications that accept attacker-controlled remote media URLs can therefore be induced to access internal HTTP services and expose data available from those services. This issue is fixed in version 0.15.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. From 0.12.3 until 0.15.0, _is_safe_url validates remote media URLs with urlparse while requests.Session().get interprets backslashes differently when sending the request. An attacker can provide a URL whose validation hostname appears globally routable but whose request destination resolves to an internal host, bypassing non-global address checks. Applications that accept attacker-controlled remote media URLs can therefore be induced to access internal HTTP services and expose data available from those services. This issue is fixed in version 0.15.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-123818</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-39wr-7q6h-cf68 — LMDeploy has an SSRF bypass</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-39wr-7q6h-cf68</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: lmdeploy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
The URL checking logic in lmdeploy has a logical flaw that could be bypassed by attackers, leading to SSRF attacks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
The current lmdeploy project uses `_is_safe_url` to validate the input URL. The main logic is to perform security checks on the host portion of the URL extracted by urlparse to prevent SSRF attacks.
&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;943&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;836&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260416-203956-16-1&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/042faad1-7458-444a-bbc9-525c772b0a4d&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;
However, there are indeed differences in parsing between urlparse and the library that actually sends the request. Currently, almost all application scenarios in this project involve first using `_is_safe_url` for URL validation, and then using requests.Session().get to send the request.
&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;1086&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;576&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260416-204053-16-2&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7ffb8a69-b155-483a-90be-016c53e6387a&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;
The core issue: `urlparse()` and `requests` disagree on which host a URL like `http://127.0.0.1:6666\@1.1.1.1` points to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `urlparse()` treats `\` as a regular character and `@` as the userinfo-host delimiter, so it extracts hostname as 1.1.1.1 (public)
- `requests` treats `\` as a path character, connecting to `127.0.0.1` (internal)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below is a test code I wrote following the code.
```
from urllib.parse import urlparse
import ipaddress
import socket
import requests&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;def _is_safe_url(url: str) -&amp;gt; tuple[bool, str]:
    &amp;#34;&amp;#34;&amp;#34;Check if the URL is safe to fetch (not inte…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: lmdeploy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
The URL checking logic in lmdeploy has a logical flaw that could be bypassed by attackers, leading to SSRF attacks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
The current lmdeploy project uses `_is_safe_url` to validate the input URL. The main logic is to perform security checks on the host portion of the URL extracted by urlparse to prevent SSRF attacks.
&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;943&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;836&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260416-203956-16-1&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/042faad1-7458-444a-bbc9-525c772b0a4d&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;
However, there are indeed differences in parsing between urlparse and the library that actually sends the request. Currently, almost all application scenarios in this project involve first using `_is_safe_url` for URL validation, and then using requests.Session().get to send the request.
&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;1086&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;576&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260416-204053-16-2&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7ffb8a69-b155-483a-90be-016c53e6387a&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;
The core issue: `urlparse()` and `requests` disagree on which host a URL like `http://127.0.0.1:6666\@1.1.1.1` points to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `urlparse()` treats `\` as a regular character and `@` as the userinfo-host delimiter, so it extracts hostname as 1.1.1.1 (public)
- `requests` treats `\` as a path character, connecting to `127.0.0.1` (internal)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below is a test code I wrote following the code.
```
from urllib.parse import urlparse
import ipaddress
import socket
import requests&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;def _is_safe_url(url: str) -&amp;gt; tuple[bool, str]:
    &amp;#34;&amp;#34;&amp;#34;Check if the URL is safe to fetch (not inte…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-39wr-7q6h-cf68</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
