<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 14:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-100627</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-100627</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Capgo (Cap-go/capgo.app) server backend Supabase functions contain an incorrect authorization flaw in the API-key bundle promotion path. The PUT /bundle endpoint, available to &amp;#34;all&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;write&amp;#34; API keys, dispatches to setChannel, which authorizes with checkPermission(c, &amp;#39;channel.promote_bundle&amp;#39;, { appId: body.app_id }) and omits the request&amp;#39;s channel_id. Because the omitted scope field is passed to rbac_check_permission_direct as SQL NULL, and channel-scope override evaluation is gated on p_channel_id IS NOT NULL, per-channel allow/deny overrides are never evaluated. A principal holding app-level channel.promote_bundle (granted by default to the app_developer and app_uploader roles) can therefore promote a bundle to a channel for which an explicit per-channel deny override exists, updating public.channels.version for the supplied channel_id; the target channel is only validated after authorization. The issue is confirmed on main at commit de66fa51e7ff2f50283cc1455c3d80ab3eb0ae43 and likely earlier versions; no patched version is known at the time of publication.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Capgo (Cap-go/capgo.app) server backend Supabase functions contain an incorrect authorization flaw in the API-key bundle promotion path. The PUT /bundle endpoint, available to &amp;#34;all&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;write&amp;#34; API keys, dispatches to setChannel, which authorizes with checkPermission(c, &amp;#39;channel.promote_bundle&amp;#39;, { appId: body.app_id }) and omits the request&amp;#39;s channel_id. Because the omitted scope field is passed to rbac_check_permission_direct as SQL NULL, and channel-scope override evaluation is gated on p_channel_id IS NOT NULL, per-channel allow/deny overrides are never evaluated. A principal holding app-level channel.promote_bundle (granted by default to the app_developer and app_uploader roles) can therefore promote a bundle to a channel for which an explicit per-channel deny override exists, updating public.channels.version for the supplied channel_id; the target channel is only validated after authorization. The issue is confirmed on main at commit de66fa51e7ff2f50283cc1455c3d80ab3eb0ae43 and likely earlier versions; no patched version is known at the time of publication.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-100627</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-w4hm-mr28-xj78</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-w4hm-mr28-xj78</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Capgo (Cap-go/capgo.app) server backend Supabase functions contain an incorrect authorization flaw in the API-key bundle promotion path. The PUT /bundle endpoint, available to &amp;#34;all&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;write&amp;#34; API keys, dispatches to setChannel, which authorizes with checkPermission(c, &amp;#39;channel.promote_bundle&amp;#39;, { appId: body.app_id }) and omits the request&amp;#39;s channel_id. Because the omitted scope field is passed to rbac_check_permission_direct as SQL NULL, and channel-scope override evaluation is gated on p_channel_id IS NOT NULL, per-channel allow/deny overrides are never evaluated. A principal holding app-level channel.promote_bundle (granted by default to the app_developer and app_uploader roles) can therefore promote a bundle to a channel for which an explicit per-channel deny override exists, updating public.channels.version for the supplied channel_id; the target channel is only validated after authorization. The issue is confirmed on main at commit de66fa51e7ff2f50283cc1455c3d80ab3eb0ae43 and likely earlier versions; no patched version is known at the time of publication.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Capgo (Cap-go/capgo.app) server backend Supabase functions contain an incorrect authorization flaw in the API-key bundle promotion path. The PUT /bundle endpoint, available to &amp;#34;all&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;write&amp;#34; API keys, dispatches to setChannel, which authorizes with checkPermission(c, &amp;#39;channel.promote_bundle&amp;#39;, { appId: body.app_id }) and omits the request&amp;#39;s channel_id. Because the omitted scope field is passed to rbac_check_permission_direct as SQL NULL, and channel-scope override evaluation is gated on p_channel_id IS NOT NULL, per-channel allow/deny overrides are never evaluated. A principal holding app-level channel.promote_bundle (granted by default to the app_developer and app_uploader roles) can therefore promote a bundle to a channel for which an explicit per-channel deny override exists, updating public.channels.version for the supplied channel_id; the target channel is only validated after authorization. The issue is confirmed on main at commit de66fa51e7ff2f50283cc1455c3d80ab3eb0ae43 and likely earlier versions; no patched version is known at the time of publication.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-w4hm-mr28-xj78</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
