<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:47:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6hg6-v5c8-fphq — Apache Log4j Core: `verifyHostName` attribute silently ignored in TLS configuration</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-6hg6-v5c8-fphq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Maven: org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix for  CVE-2025-68161 was incomplete: it addressed hostname verification only when enabled via the  [`log4j2.sslVerifyHostName`](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/systemproperties.html#log4j2.sslVerifyHostName) system property, but not when configured through the [`verifyHostName`](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders/network.html#SslConfiguration-attr-verifyHostName) attribute of the `&amp;lt;Ssl&amp;gt;` element.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the `verifyHostName` configuration attribute was introduced in Log4j Core 2.12.0, it was silently ignored in all versions through 2.25.3, leaving TLS connections vulnerable to interception regardless of the configured value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A network-based attacker may be able to perform a man-in-the-middle attack when all of the following conditions are met:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*  An SMTP, Socket, or Syslog appender is in use.
  *  TLS is configured via a nested &amp;lt;Ssl&amp;gt; element.
  *  The attacker can present a certificate issued by a CA trusted by the appender&amp;#39;s configured trust store, or by the default Java trust store if none is configured.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue does not affect users of the HTTP appender, which uses a separate [`verifyHostname`](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders/network.html#HttpAppender-attr-verifyHostName) attribute that was not subject to this bug and verifies host names by default.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core 2.25.4, which corrects this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Maven: org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix for  CVE-2025-68161 was incomplete: it addressed hostname verification only when enabled via the  [`log4j2.sslVerifyHostName`](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/systemproperties.html#log4j2.sslVerifyHostName) system property, but not when configured through the [`verifyHostName`](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders/network.html#SslConfiguration-attr-verifyHostName) attribute of the `&amp;lt;Ssl&amp;gt;` element.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the `verifyHostName` configuration attribute was introduced in Log4j Core 2.12.0, it was silently ignored in all versions through 2.25.3, leaving TLS connections vulnerable to interception regardless of the configured value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A network-based attacker may be able to perform a man-in-the-middle attack when all of the following conditions are met:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*  An SMTP, Socket, or Syslog appender is in use.
  *  TLS is configured via a nested &amp;lt;Ssl&amp;gt; element.
  *  The attacker can present a certificate issued by a CA trusted by the appender&amp;#39;s configured trust store, or by the default Java trust store if none is configured.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue does not affect users of the HTTP appender, which uses a separate [`verifyHostname`](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders/network.html#HttpAppender-attr-verifyHostName) attribute that was not subject to this bug and verifies host names by default.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core 2.25.4, which corrects this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-6hg6-v5c8-fphq</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
