<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:02:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-18218 — Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: client not-before revocation ignored when realm not-before is older but nonzero</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-18218</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6, Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7, Red Hat Data Grid 8, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack, Red Hat Single Sign-On 7&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A flaw was found in the TokenManager component of the Keycloak identity management service. When an administrator attempts to revoke tokens for a specific application (client) using a &amp;#34;not-before&amp;#34; policy, the revocation may be silently ignored if the overall security realm already has an older, non-zero revocation policy in place. This issue can allow previously issued tokens to remain valid for refreshing sessions and accessing user information even after an administrator has attempted to invalidate them.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6, Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7, Red Hat Data Grid 8, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack, Red Hat Single Sign-On 7&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A flaw was found in the TokenManager component of the Keycloak identity management service. When an administrator attempts to revoke tokens for a specific application (client) using a &amp;#34;not-before&amp;#34; policy, the revocation may be silently ignored if the overall security realm already has an older, non-zero revocation policy in place. This issue can allow previously issued tokens to remain valid for refreshing sessions and accessing user information even after an administrator has attempted to invalidate them.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-18218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
