<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 23:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-112939 — filelock: SoftFileLock removes a live holder's marker when another user forges the PID in a writable marker</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-112939</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; tox-dev filelock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.22.0 until 4.2.1, SoftFileLock can trust a forged process identifier in a marker that an attacker can modify but cannot remove, allowing an authorized contender such as another process of the holder&amp;#39;s account or root to act as a confused deputy, remove the live marker, and admit another holder. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; tox-dev filelock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.22.0 until 4.2.1, SoftFileLock can trust a forged process identifier in a marker that an attacker can modify but cannot remove, allowing an authorized contender such as another process of the holder&amp;#39;s account or root to act as a confused deputy, remove the live marker, and admit another holder. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-112939</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-rfpc-qcw5-3pc4 — filelock: SoftFileLock removes a live holder's marker when another user forges the PID in a writable marker</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rfpc-qcw5-3pc4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: filelock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`SoftFileLock`, `MarkerSoftFileLock`, `SoftFileLease`, their async variants and a `FileLock` that has fallen back to a soft lock on `ENOSYS` decide from the record inside the marker file whether its owner is gone. The marker is the file whose presence says a process holds the lock. They do not check who could have written that record.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A local user who can write the marker but cannot remove it rewrites the holder&amp;#39;s record to name a dead PID (process id). That position arises with an explicit `mode` with group or other write bits, or the default mode under a lax umask (the process setting that strips permission bits from new files), in a sticky or otherwise non-removable directory. The sticky bit is a directory flag that lets only a file&amp;#39;s owner remove or rename it. The next contender running as the holder&amp;#39;s account, or root, judges the lock stale, removes the live marker on that user&amp;#39;s behalf and acquires it. Two processes then run the critical section together and neither gets an error. Affected versions are filelock 3.22.0 through 4.2.0 (finding `ANT-2026-W1H9NXUH`).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Severity&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**CVSS 3.1 `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N` scores 4.7 (Medium).** `AV:L` (local): the other user needs an account on the same host. `PR:L` (low privileges): an ordinary account is enough. `UI:N` (no user interaction). `AC:H` (high attack complexity): the marker must carry group or other write bits (an explicit permissive `mode`, or umask `002`/`000` with a shared group), and a cont…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: filelock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`SoftFileLock`, `MarkerSoftFileLock`, `SoftFileLease`, their async variants and a `FileLock` that has fallen back to a soft lock on `ENOSYS` decide from the record inside the marker file whether its owner is gone. The marker is the file whose presence says a process holds the lock. They do not check who could have written that record.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A local user who can write the marker but cannot remove it rewrites the holder&amp;#39;s record to name a dead PID (process id). That position arises with an explicit `mode` with group or other write bits, or the default mode under a lax umask (the process setting that strips permission bits from new files), in a sticky or otherwise non-removable directory. The sticky bit is a directory flag that lets only a file&amp;#39;s owner remove or rename it. The next contender running as the holder&amp;#39;s account, or root, judges the lock stale, removes the live marker on that user&amp;#39;s behalf and acquires it. Two processes then run the critical section together and neither gets an error. Affected versions are filelock 3.22.0 through 4.2.0 (finding `ANT-2026-W1H9NXUH`).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Severity&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**CVSS 3.1 `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N` scores 4.7 (Medium).** `AV:L` (local): the other user needs an account on the same host. `PR:L` (low privileges): an ordinary account is enough. `UI:N` (no user interaction). `AC:H` (high attack complexity): the marker must carry group or other write bits (an explicit permissive `mode`, or umask `002`/`000` with a shared group), and a cont…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rfpc-qcw5-3pc4</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
