<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 05:43:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BIT-jupyterlab-2026-73626 — JupyterLab before 4.6.2 Authentication Bypass via PyPIExtensionManager</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/bit-jupyterlab-2026-73626</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: jupyterlab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JupyterLab versions &amp;gt;=4.6.0,&amp;lt;=4.6.1 and &amp;lt;=4.5.9 contain an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap in PyPIExtensionManager.install(). A missing &amp;#39;await&amp;#39; caused the is_install_allowed coroutine to never execute, so the extension allowlist/blocklist check was not enforced for direct callers of install(). The stock JupyterLab HTTP API and Extension Manager UI are not affected, as they perform a separate, correctly awaited check. The issue affects only deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration imports PyPIExtensionManager and calls install() directly with a package name influenced by untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled, and kernels and terminals are disabled or delegated to remote hosts. Fixed in JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: jupyterlab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JupyterLab versions &amp;gt;=4.6.0,&amp;lt;=4.6.1 and &amp;lt;=4.5.9 contain an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap in PyPIExtensionManager.install(). A missing &amp;#39;await&amp;#39; caused the is_install_allowed coroutine to never execute, so the extension allowlist/blocklist check was not enforced for direct callers of install(). The stock JupyterLab HTTP API and Extension Manager UI are not affected, as they perform a separate, correctly awaited check. The issue affects only deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration imports PyPIExtensionManager and calls install() directly with a package name influenced by untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled, and kernels and terminals are disabled or delegated to remote hosts. Fixed in JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/bit-jupyterlab-2026-73626</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-73626 — JupyterLab before 4.6.2 Authentication Bypass via PyPIExtensionManager</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-73626</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; jupyterlab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JupyterLab versions &amp;gt;=4.6.0,&amp;lt;=4.6.1 and &amp;lt;=4.5.9 contain an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap in PyPIExtensionManager.install(). A missing &amp;#39;await&amp;#39; caused the is_install_allowed coroutine to never execute, so the extension allowlist/blocklist check was not enforced for direct callers of install(). The stock JupyterLab HTTP API and Extension Manager UI are not affected, as they perform a separate, correctly awaited check. The issue affects only deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration imports PyPIExtensionManager and calls install() directly with a package name influenced by untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled, and kernels and terminals are disabled or delegated to remote hosts. Fixed in JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; jupyterlab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JupyterLab versions &amp;gt;=4.6.0,&amp;lt;=4.6.1 and &amp;lt;=4.5.9 contain an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap in PyPIExtensionManager.install(). A missing &amp;#39;await&amp;#39; caused the is_install_allowed coroutine to never execute, so the extension allowlist/blocklist check was not enforced for direct callers of install(). The stock JupyterLab HTTP API and Extension Manager UI are not affected, as they perform a separate, correctly awaited check. The issue affects only deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration imports PyPIExtensionManager and calls install() directly with a package name influenced by untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled, and kernels and terminals are disabled or delegated to remote hosts. Fixed in JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-73626</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-whvh-wf3x-g77j — JupyterLab: Allowlist/blocklist check in `PyPIExtensionManager.install()` not enforced for direct callers (missing `awa…</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-whvh-wf3x-g77j</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: jupyterlab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The extension allowlist/blocklist check inside `PyPIExtensionManager.install()` was not enforced due to a missing await. For purposes of JupyterLab this was a secondary defense-in-depth check: `install()` was intended to enforce the allowlist/blocklist itself for any future uses and users calling this method directly (in addition to the separate check handling requests arriving through the HTTP API).  The only runtime symptom was a `RuntimeWarning: coroutine &amp;#39;is_install_allowed&amp;#39; was never awaited.`&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This has security implications only for deployments that combine all of the following:
- a custom extension or downstream integration that imports `PyPIExtensionManager` and calls `install()` directly with a package name influenced by untrusted user input (the stock JupyterLab HTTP handler is not affected - it performs its own awaited allowlist check before calling `install()`);
- an allowlist/blocklist configured with the intent of restricting which packages users can install;
- the (default) PyPI Extension Manager enabled; and
- kernels and terminals disabled or delegated to remote hosts, so that the custom extension&amp;#39;s `install()` call is the only available package-install vector (otherwise a user with kernel access can install packages directly regardless of this check)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Low. No exposure for stock JupyterLab: the HTTP API and Extension Manager UI enforce the listing through a separate, correctly awaited check. The gap affected only custom extensions or downstream i…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: jupyterlab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The extension allowlist/blocklist check inside `PyPIExtensionManager.install()` was not enforced due to a missing await. For purposes of JupyterLab this was a secondary defense-in-depth check: `install()` was intended to enforce the allowlist/blocklist itself for any future uses and users calling this method directly (in addition to the separate check handling requests arriving through the HTTP API).  The only runtime symptom was a `RuntimeWarning: coroutine &amp;#39;is_install_allowed&amp;#39; was never awaited.`&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This has security implications only for deployments that combine all of the following:
- a custom extension or downstream integration that imports `PyPIExtensionManager` and calls `install()` directly with a package name influenced by untrusted user input (the stock JupyterLab HTTP handler is not affected - it performs its own awaited allowlist check before calling `install()`);
- an allowlist/blocklist configured with the intent of restricting which packages users can install;
- the (default) PyPI Extension Manager enabled; and
- kernels and terminals disabled or delegated to remote hosts, so that the custom extension&amp;#39;s `install()` call is the only available package-install vector (otherwise a user with kernel access can install packages directly regardless of this check)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Low. No exposure for stock JupyterLab: the HTTP API and Extension Manager UI enforce the listing through a separate, correctly awaited check. The gap affected only custom extensions or downstream i…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-whvh-wf3x-g77j</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
