<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:47:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-32109 — Copyparty has unexpected JavaScript execution via crafted URL to folder with `.prologue.html`</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-32109</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; 9001 copyparty&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to 1.20.12, if an attacker has been given both read- and write-permissions to the server, they can upload a malicious file with the filename .prologue.html and then craft a link to potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim&amp;#39;s context. Note that it is intended behavior that the JavaScript would execute if the target clicks a link to the HTML file itself; &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/.prologue.html&amp;#34;. The vulnerability is that &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/?b&amp;#34; would also evaluate the file, making the behavior unexpected. There are existing preventative measures (strict SameSite cookies) which makes it harder to leverage this vulnerability in an attack; in order to gain control of the target&amp;#39;s authenticated session, the link must be clicked from a page served by the server itself -- most likely by editing an existing resource, which would require additional access permissions. Finally, for this attack to be successful, the attacker&amp;#39;s target must click the specific crafted link given by the attacker. This vulnerability is not activated by normally browsing the web-UI on the server. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.20.12.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; 9001 copyparty&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to 1.20.12, if an attacker has been given both read- and write-permissions to the server, they can upload a malicious file with the filename .prologue.html and then craft a link to potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim&amp;#39;s context. Note that it is intended behavior that the JavaScript would execute if the target clicks a link to the HTML file itself; &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/.prologue.html&amp;#34;. The vulnerability is that &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/?b&amp;#34; would also evaluate the file, making the behavior unexpected. There are existing preventative measures (strict SameSite cookies) which makes it harder to leverage this vulnerability in an attack; in order to gain control of the target&amp;#39;s authenticated session, the link must be clicked from a page served by the server itself -- most likely by editing an existing resource, which would require additional access permissions. Finally, for this attack to be successful, the attacker&amp;#39;s target must click the specific crafted link given by the attacker. This vulnerability is not activated by normally browsing the web-UI on the server. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.20.12.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-32109</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-rcp6-88mm-9vgf — Copyparty has unexpected JavaScript execution via crafted URL to folder with `.prologue.html`</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rcp6-88mm-9vgf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: copyparty&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an attacker has been given both read- and write-permissions to the server, they can upload a malicious file with the filename `.prologue.html` and then craft a link to potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim&amp;#39;s context.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that it is intended behavior that the JavaScript would execute if the target clicks a link to the HTML file itself; &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/.prologue.html&amp;#34;. The vulnerability is that &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/?b&amp;#34; would also evaluate the file, making the behavior unexpected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are existing preventative measures (strict SameSite cookies) which makes it harder to leverage this vulnerability in an attack; in order to gain control of the target&amp;#39;s authenticated session, the link must be clicked from a page served by the server itself -- most likely by editing an existing resource, which would require additional access permissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally, for this attack to be successful, the attacker&amp;#39;s target must click the specific crafted link given by the attacker. This vulnerability is not activated by normally browsing the web-UI on the server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If successful, the malicious JavaScript could move or delete existing files on the server, or upload new files, using the account of the person who opens the link.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: copyparty&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an attacker has been given both read- and write-permissions to the server, they can upload a malicious file with the filename `.prologue.html` and then craft a link to potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim&amp;#39;s context.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that it is intended behavior that the JavaScript would execute if the target clicks a link to the HTML file itself; &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/.prologue.html&amp;#34;. The vulnerability is that &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/?b&amp;#34; would also evaluate the file, making the behavior unexpected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are existing preventative measures (strict SameSite cookies) which makes it harder to leverage this vulnerability in an attack; in order to gain control of the target&amp;#39;s authenticated session, the link must be clicked from a page served by the server itself -- most likely by editing an existing resource, which would require additional access permissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally, for this attack to be successful, the attacker&amp;#39;s target must click the specific crafted link given by the attacker. This vulnerability is not activated by normally browsing the web-UI on the server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If successful, the malicious JavaScript could move or delete existing files on the server, or upload new files, using the account of the person who opens the link.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rcp6-88mm-9vgf</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2026-32</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/pysec-2026-32</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: copyparty&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to 1.20.12, if an attacker has been given both read- and write-permissions to the server, they can upload a malicious file with the filename .prologue.html and then craft a link to potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim&amp;#39;s context. Note that it is intended behavior that the JavaScript would execute if the target clicks a link to the HTML file itself; &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/.prologue.html&amp;#34;. The vulnerability is that &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/?b&amp;#34; would also evaluate the file, making the behavior unexpected. There are existing preventative measures (strict SameSite cookies) which makes it harder to leverage this vulnerability in an attack; in order to gain control of the target&amp;#39;s authenticated session, the link must be clicked from a page served by the server itself -- most likely by editing an existing resource, which would require additional access permissions. Finally, for this attack to be successful, the attacker&amp;#39;s target must click the specific crafted link given by the attacker. This vulnerability is not activated by normally browsing the web-UI on the server. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.20.12.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: copyparty&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to 1.20.12, if an attacker has been given both read- and write-permissions to the server, they can upload a malicious file with the filename .prologue.html and then craft a link to potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim&amp;#39;s context. Note that it is intended behavior that the JavaScript would execute if the target clicks a link to the HTML file itself; &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/.prologue.html&amp;#34;. The vulnerability is that &amp;#34;https://example.com/foo/?b&amp;#34; would also evaluate the file, making the behavior unexpected. There are existing preventative measures (strict SameSite cookies) which makes it harder to leverage this vulnerability in an attack; in order to gain control of the target&amp;#39;s authenticated session, the link must be clicked from a page served by the server itself -- most likely by editing an existing resource, which would require additional access permissions. Finally, for this attack to be successful, the attacker&amp;#39;s target must click the specific crafted link given by the attacker. This vulnerability is not activated by normally browsing the web-UI on the server. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.20.12.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/pysec-2026-32</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
