<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-33413 — etcd: Authorization bypasses in multiple APIs</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-33413</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; etcd-io etcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9, unauthorized users may bypass authentication or authorization checks and call certain etcd functions in clusters that expose the gRPC API to untrusted or partially trusted clients. In unpatched etcd clusters with etcd auth enabled, unauthorized users are able to call MemberList and learn cluster topology, including member IDs and advertised endpoints; call Alarm, which can be abused for operational disruption or denial of service; use Lease APIs, interfering with TTL-based keys and lease ownership; and/or trigger compaction, permanently removing historical revisions and disrupting watch, audit, and recovery workflows. Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected. Versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9 contain a patch. If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice. Restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect and/or require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTLS with tightly scoped client certificate distribution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; etcd-io etcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9, unauthorized users may bypass authentication or authorization checks and call certain etcd functions in clusters that expose the gRPC API to untrusted or partially trusted clients. In unpatched etcd clusters with etcd auth enabled, unauthorized users are able to call MemberList and learn cluster topology, including member IDs and advertised endpoints; call Alarm, which can be abused for operational disruption or denial of service; use Lease APIs, interfering with TTL-based keys and lease ownership; and/or trigger compaction, permanently removing historical revisions and disrupting watch, audit, and recovery workflows. Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected. Versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9 contain a patch. If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice. Restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect and/or require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTLS with tightly scoped client certificate distribution.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-33413</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg — etcd: Authorization bypasses in multiple APIs</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-q8m4-xhhv-38mg</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: go.etcd.io/etcd/v3, Go: go.etcd.io/etcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multiple vulnerabilities allow unauthorized users to bypass authentication or authorization checks and call certain etcd functions in clusters that expose the gRPC API to untrusted or partially trusted clients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In unpatched etcd clusters with etcd auth enabled, unauthorized users are able to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- call MemberList and learn cluster topology, including member IDs and advertised endpoints
  - call Alarm, which can be abused for operational disruption or denial of service
  - use Lease APIs, interfering with TTL-based keys and lease ownership
  - trigger compaction, permanently removing historical revisions and disrupting watch, audit, and recovery workflows&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These vulnerabilities are patched in the following versions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* etcd 3.6.9
* etcd 3.5.28
* etcd 3.4.42&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds
_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected 
RPCs as unauthenticated in practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect
- require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTL…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: go.etcd.io/etcd/v3, Go: go.etcd.io/etcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multiple vulnerabilities allow unauthorized users to bypass authentication or authorization checks and call certain etcd functions in clusters that expose the gRPC API to untrusted or partially trusted clients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In unpatched etcd clusters with etcd auth enabled, unauthorized users are able to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- call MemberList and learn cluster topology, including member IDs and advertised endpoints
  - call Alarm, which can be abused for operational disruption or denial of service
  - use Lease APIs, interfering with TTL-based keys and lease ownership
  - trigger compaction, permanently removing historical revisions and disrupting watch, audit, and recovery workflows&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These vulnerabilities are patched in the following versions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* etcd 3.6.9
* etcd 3.5.28
* etcd 3.4.42&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds
_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected 
RPCs as unauthenticated in practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect
- require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTL…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-q8m4-xhhv-38mg</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
