<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 05:45:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-53142 — drm/xe/display: fix oops in suspend/shutdown without display</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-53142</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/xe/display: fix oops in suspend/shutdown without display&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The xe driver keeps track of whether to probe display, and whether
display hardware is there, using xe-&amp;gt;info.probe_display. It gets set to
false if there&amp;#39;s no display after intel_display_device_probe(). However,
the display may also be disabled via fuses, detected at a later time in
intel_display_device_info_runtime_init().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this case, the xe driver does for_each_intel_crtc() on uninitialized
mode config in xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(), leading to a NULL
pointer dereference, and generally calls display code with display info
cleared.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check for intel_display_device_present() after
intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(), and reset
xe-&amp;gt;info.probe_display as necessary. Also do unset_display_features()
for completeness, although display runtime init has already done
that. This will need to be unified across all cases later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move intel_display_device_info_runtime_init() call slightly earlier,
similar to i915, to avoid a bunch of unnecessary setup for no display
cases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note #1: The xe driver has no business doing low level display plumbing
like for_each_intel_crtc() to begin with. It all needs to happen in
display code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note #2: The actual bug is present already in commit 44e694958b95
(&amp;#34;drm/xe/display: Implement display support&amp;#34;), but the oops was likely
introduced later at commit ddf6492e0e50 (&amp;#34;drm/xe/display: Make display
suspend/resume wo…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/xe/display: fix oops in suspend/shutdown without display&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The xe driver keeps track of whether to probe display, and whether
display hardware is there, using xe-&amp;gt;info.probe_display. It gets set to
false if there&amp;#39;s no display after intel_display_device_probe(). However,
the display may also be disabled via fuses, detected at a later time in
intel_display_device_info_runtime_init().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this case, the xe driver does for_each_intel_crtc() on uninitialized
mode config in xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(), leading to a NULL
pointer dereference, and generally calls display code with display info
cleared.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check for intel_display_device_present() after
intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(), and reset
xe-&amp;gt;info.probe_display as necessary. Also do unset_display_features()
for completeness, although display runtime init has already done
that. This will need to be unified across all cases later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move intel_display_device_info_runtime_init() call slightly earlier,
similar to i915, to avoid a bunch of unnecessary setup for no display
cases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note #1: The xe driver has no business doing low level display plumbing
like for_each_intel_crtc() to begin with. It all needs to happen in
display code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note #2: The actual bug is present already in commit 44e694958b95
(&amp;#34;drm/xe/display: Implement display support&amp;#34;), but the oops was likely
introduced later at commit ddf6492e0e50 (&amp;#34;drm/xe/display: Make display
suspend/resume wo…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-53142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
