<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 21:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-53035 — bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-53035</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast
path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning
at sock_map_update_elem()&amp;#39;s bh_lock_sock():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
       ----
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4 locks held by test_progs/1393:
 #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0
 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0
 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80
 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce
 __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590
 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0
 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4
 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00
 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0
 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 vfs_re…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast
path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning
at sock_map_update_elem()&amp;#39;s bh_lock_sock():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
       ----
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4 locks held by test_progs/1393:
 #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0
 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0
 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80
 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce
 __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590
 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0
 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4
 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00
 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0
 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 vfs_re…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-53035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
