<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 10:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>RUSTSEC-2026-0515 — Recursor followed every glueless name server in a referral, with no per-query budget</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rustsec-2026-0515</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: hickory-resolver&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a referral listed name servers outside the delegated zone and gave no glue addresses, the recursor looked up A and AAAA records for every listed name server, recursing into each one. Only the chain-depth limits applied. There was no cap on how many name servers it chased per referral or on the total upstream work per client query.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Someone who controls a zone can return referrals that list many glueless name servers in a victim&amp;#39;s domain, and nest them, so that each client query makes the recursor send a large number of queries to the victim&amp;#39;s servers (the NXNSAttack pattern). The same can exhaust the recursor&amp;#39;s own resources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This affects the recursive resolver, which is in hickory-resolver behind the opt-in `recursor` feature from 0.26.0-beta.1. Earlier releases shipped it as the separate hickory-recursor crate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From 0.26.2 the recursor follows at most 5 glueless name servers per delegation and sends at most 200 upstream queries per client request.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: hickory-resolver&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a referral listed name servers outside the delegated zone and gave no glue addresses, the recursor looked up A and AAAA records for every listed name server, recursing into each one. Only the chain-depth limits applied. There was no cap on how many name servers it chased per referral or on the total upstream work per client query.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Someone who controls a zone can return referrals that list many glueless name servers in a victim&amp;#39;s domain, and nest them, so that each client query makes the recursor send a large number of queries to the victim&amp;#39;s servers (the NXNSAttack pattern). The same can exhaust the recursor&amp;#39;s own resources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This affects the recursive resolver, which is in hickory-resolver behind the opt-in `recursor` feature from 0.26.0-beta.1. Earlier releases shipped it as the separate hickory-recursor crate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From 0.26.2 the recursor follows at most 5 glueless name servers per delegation and sends at most 200 upstream queries per client request.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rustsec-2026-0515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
