<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 07:13:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-99256</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99256</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dm cache: fix issue with background work locking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dm cache used a rw_semaphore for background_work_lock. Write locks on
rw_semaphores have strict owner semantics, but there was no guarantee
that the process that locked background_work_lock was the same process
that unlocked it. This can be easily seen using a kernel compiled with
CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS. Given a dm cache device &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;, run: &amp;#39;dmsetup
suspend &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt; &amp;amp;&amp;amp; dmsetup resume &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;&amp;#39;. This will trigger a kernel
warning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON((rwsem_owner(sem) != current) &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE))&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;triggered by cache_resume(). To fix this, switch from a rw_semaphore to
a spinlock and a wait queue. dm cache already has a wait queue and
associated counter, migration_wait and nr_allocated_migrations, that was
getting woken up when background work was getting completed, but wasn&amp;#39;t
actually used by anything. This is replaced by the background_work queue
and counter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dm cache: fix issue with background work locking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dm cache used a rw_semaphore for background_work_lock. Write locks on
rw_semaphores have strict owner semantics, but there was no guarantee
that the process that locked background_work_lock was the same process
that unlocked it. This can be easily seen using a kernel compiled with
CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS. Given a dm cache device &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;, run: &amp;#39;dmsetup
suspend &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt; &amp;amp;&amp;amp; dmsetup resume &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;&amp;#39;. This will trigger a kernel
warning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON((rwsem_owner(sem) != current) &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE))&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;triggered by cache_resume(). To fix this, switch from a rw_semaphore to
a spinlock and a wait queue. dm cache already has a wait queue and
associated counter, migration_wait and nr_allocated_migrations, that was
getting woken up when background work was getting completed, but wasn&amp;#39;t
actually used by anything. This is replaced by the background_work queue
and counter.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99256</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-pr5p-x5rg-2942</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-pr5p-x5rg-2942</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dm cache: fix issue with background work locking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dm cache used a rw_semaphore for background_work_lock. Write locks on
rw_semaphores have strict owner semantics, but there was no guarantee
that the process that locked background_work_lock was the same process
that unlocked it. This can be easily seen using a kernel compiled with
CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS. Given a dm cache device &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;, run: &amp;#39;dmsetup
suspend &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt; &amp;amp;&amp;amp; dmsetup resume &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;&amp;#39;. This will trigger a kernel
warning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON((rwsem_owner(sem) != current) &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE))&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;triggered by cache_resume(). To fix this, switch from a rw_semaphore to
a spinlock and a wait queue. dm cache already has a wait queue and
associated counter, migration_wait and nr_allocated_migrations, that was
getting woken up when background work was getting completed, but wasn&amp;#39;t
actually used by anything. This is replaced by the background_work queue
and counter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dm cache: fix issue with background work locking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dm cache used a rw_semaphore for background_work_lock. Write locks on
rw_semaphores have strict owner semantics, but there was no guarantee
that the process that locked background_work_lock was the same process
that unlocked it. This can be easily seen using a kernel compiled with
CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS. Given a dm cache device &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;, run: &amp;#39;dmsetup
suspend &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt; &amp;amp;&amp;amp; dmsetup resume &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;&amp;#39;. This will trigger a kernel
warning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON((rwsem_owner(sem) != current) &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE))&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;triggered by cache_resume(). To fix this, switch from a rw_semaphore to
a spinlock and a wait queue. dm cache already has a wait queue and
associated counter, migration_wait and nr_allocated_migrations, that was
getting woken up when background work was getting completed, but wasn&amp;#39;t
actually used by anything. This is replaced by the background_work queue
and counter.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-pr5p-x5rg-2942</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-99256</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-99256</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 240 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm cache: fix issue with background work locking dm cache used a rw_semaphore for background_work_lock. Write locks on rw_semaphores have strict owner semantics, but there was no guarantee that the process that locked background_work_lock was the same process that unlocked it. This can be easily seen using a kernel compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS. Given a dm cache device &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;, run: &amp;#39;dmsetup suspend &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt; &amp;amp;&amp;amp; dmsetup resume &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;&amp;#39;. This will trigger a kernel warning: DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON((rwsem_owner(sem) != current) &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE)) triggered by cache_resume(). To fix this, switch from a rw_semaphore to a spinlock and a wait queue. dm cache already has a wait queue and associated counter, migration_wait and nr_allocated_migrations, that was getting woken up when background work was getting completed, but wasn&amp;#39;t actually used by anything. This is replaced by the background_work queue and counter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 240 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm cache: fix issue with background work locking dm cache used a rw_semaphore for background_work_lock. Write locks on rw_semaphores have strict owner semantics, but there was no guarantee that the process that locked background_work_lock was the same process that unlocked it. This can be easily seen using a kernel compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS. Given a dm cache device &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;, run: &amp;#39;dmsetup suspend &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt; &amp;amp;&amp;amp; dmsetup resume &amp;lt;cache&amp;gt;&amp;#39;. This will trigger a kernel warning: DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON((rwsem_owner(sem) != current) &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE)) triggered by cache_resume(). To fix this, switch from a rw_semaphore to a spinlock and a wait queue. dm cache already has a wait queue and associated counter, migration_wait and nr_allocated_migrations, that was getting woken up when background work was getting completed, but wasn&amp;#39;t actually used by anything. This is replaced by the background_work queue and counter.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-99256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
