<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-99239</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99239</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bluetooth: L2CAP: refuse __l2cap_chan_add if chan already has conn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2cap_chan may be linked to l2cap_conn at most once. This is assumed in
several places, eg l2cap_chan_del cleanup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a TOCTOU race where the invariant is violated:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Task 1]                          [Task 2]
    l2cap_chan_connect                l2cap_sock_bind
      l2cap_chan_lock                   lock_sock
      l2cap_state_change                if (sk-&amp;gt;sk_state != BT_OPEN)
        chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_CONNECT
        l2cap_sock_state_change_cb      chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_BOUND
                                        sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_BOUND
          lock_sock &amp;lt;------------------ release_sock
          sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_CONNECT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2cap_sock_connect() does not check sk-&amp;gt;sk_state, so since chan-&amp;gt;state
is now BT_BOUND, subsequent connect() ends up with second
__l2cap_chan_add.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Explicitly document and check the invariant in __l2cap_chan_add with
WARN_ON_ONCE. The only callsite where it could be hit is
l2cap_chan_connect, so add pre-check there to avoid relying on
chan-&amp;gt;state. chan-&amp;gt;state read/write is not properly guarded currently so
there can be other TOCTOUC problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add l2cap_lock_chan in l2cap_sock_bind() to guard chan-&amp;gt;state write.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bluetooth: L2CAP: refuse __l2cap_chan_add if chan already has conn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2cap_chan may be linked to l2cap_conn at most once. This is assumed in
several places, eg l2cap_chan_del cleanup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a TOCTOU race where the invariant is violated:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Task 1]                          [Task 2]
    l2cap_chan_connect                l2cap_sock_bind
      l2cap_chan_lock                   lock_sock
      l2cap_state_change                if (sk-&amp;gt;sk_state != BT_OPEN)
        chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_CONNECT
        l2cap_sock_state_change_cb      chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_BOUND
                                        sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_BOUND
          lock_sock &amp;lt;------------------ release_sock
          sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_CONNECT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2cap_sock_connect() does not check sk-&amp;gt;sk_state, so since chan-&amp;gt;state
is now BT_BOUND, subsequent connect() ends up with second
__l2cap_chan_add.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Explicitly document and check the invariant in __l2cap_chan_add with
WARN_ON_ONCE. The only callsite where it could be hit is
l2cap_chan_connect, so add pre-check there to avoid relying on
chan-&amp;gt;state. chan-&amp;gt;state read/write is not properly guarded currently so
there can be other TOCTOUC problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add l2cap_lock_chan in l2cap_sock_bind() to guard chan-&amp;gt;state write.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99239</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-367g-m7cr-7mf6</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-367g-m7cr-7mf6</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bluetooth: L2CAP: refuse __l2cap_chan_add if chan already has conn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2cap_chan may be linked to l2cap_conn at most once. This is assumed in
several places, eg l2cap_chan_del cleanup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a TOCTOU race where the invariant is violated:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Task 1]                          [Task 2]
    l2cap_chan_connect                l2cap_sock_bind
      l2cap_chan_lock                   lock_sock
      l2cap_state_change                if (sk-&amp;gt;sk_state != BT_OPEN)
        chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_CONNECT
        l2cap_sock_state_change_cb      chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_BOUND
                                        sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_BOUND
          lock_sock &amp;lt;------------------ release_sock
          sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_CONNECT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2cap_sock_connect() does not check sk-&amp;gt;sk_state, so since chan-&amp;gt;state
is now BT_BOUND, subsequent connect() ends up with second
__l2cap_chan_add.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Explicitly document and check the invariant in __l2cap_chan_add with
WARN_ON_ONCE. The only callsite where it could be hit is
l2cap_chan_connect, so add pre-check there to avoid relying on
chan-&amp;gt;state. chan-&amp;gt;state read/write is not properly guarded currently so
there can be other TOCTOUC problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add l2cap_lock_chan in l2cap_sock_bind() to guard chan-&amp;gt;state write.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bluetooth: L2CAP: refuse __l2cap_chan_add if chan already has conn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2cap_chan may be linked to l2cap_conn at most once. This is assumed in
several places, eg l2cap_chan_del cleanup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a TOCTOU race where the invariant is violated:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Task 1]                          [Task 2]
    l2cap_chan_connect                l2cap_sock_bind
      l2cap_chan_lock                   lock_sock
      l2cap_state_change                if (sk-&amp;gt;sk_state != BT_OPEN)
        chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_CONNECT
        l2cap_sock_state_change_cb      chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_BOUND
                                        sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_BOUND
          lock_sock &amp;lt;------------------ release_sock
          sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_CONNECT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;l2cap_sock_connect() does not check sk-&amp;gt;sk_state, so since chan-&amp;gt;state
is now BT_BOUND, subsequent connect() ends up with second
__l2cap_chan_add.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Explicitly document and check the invariant in __l2cap_chan_add with
WARN_ON_ONCE. The only callsite where it could be hit is
l2cap_chan_connect, so add pre-check there to avoid relying on
chan-&amp;gt;state. chan-&amp;gt;state read/write is not properly guarded currently so
there can be other TOCTOUC problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add l2cap_lock_chan in l2cap_sock_bind() to guard chan-&amp;gt;state write.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-367g-m7cr-7mf6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-4810 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/oesa-2026-4810</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: brcmsmac: Fix dma_free_coherent() size&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dma_alloc_consistent() may change the size to align it. The new size is
saved in alloced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Change the free size to match the allocation size.(CVE-2026-31661)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/amd/display: Validate GPIO pin LUT table size before iterating&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Why&amp;amp;amp;How]
The GPIO pin table parsers in get_gpio_i2c_info() and
bios_parser_get_gpio_pin_info() derive an element count from the VBIOS
table_header.structuresize field, then iterate over gpio_pin[] entries.
However, GET_IMAGE() only validates that the table header itself fits
within the BIOS image. If the VBIOS reports a structuresize larger than
the actual mapped data, the loop reads past the end of the BIOS image,
causing an out-of-bounds read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by calling bios_get_image() to validate that the full claimed
structuresize is accessible within the BIOS image before entering the
loop in both functions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(cherry picked from commit ba5e95b43b773ae1bf1f66ee6b31eb774e65afe3)(CVE-2026-64097)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vep_alloc_request() wasn&amp;amp;apos;t initializing vrequest-&amp;amp;gt;udc, so cancellations
on the FunctionFS AIO path were arriving in vep_dequeue without a valid
UDC reference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since vrequest-&amp;amp;gt;udc…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: brcmsmac: Fix dma_free_coherent() size&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dma_alloc_consistent() may change the size to align it. The new size is
saved in alloced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Change the free size to match the allocation size.(CVE-2026-31661)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/amd/display: Validate GPIO pin LUT table size before iterating&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Why&amp;amp;amp;How]
The GPIO pin table parsers in get_gpio_i2c_info() and
bios_parser_get_gpio_pin_info() derive an element count from the VBIOS
table_header.structuresize field, then iterate over gpio_pin[] entries.
However, GET_IMAGE() only validates that the table header itself fits
within the BIOS image. If the VBIOS reports a structuresize larger than
the actual mapped data, the loop reads past the end of the BIOS image,
causing an out-of-bounds read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by calling bios_get_image() to validate that the full claimed
structuresize is accessible within the BIOS image before entering the
loop in both functions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(cherry picked from commit ba5e95b43b773ae1bf1f66ee6b31eb774e65afe3)(CVE-2026-64097)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vep_alloc_request() wasn&amp;amp;apos;t initializing vrequest-&amp;amp;gt;udc, so cancellations
on the FunctionFS AIO path were arriving in vep_dequeue without a valid
UDC reference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since vrequest-&amp;amp;gt;udc…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/oesa-2026-4810</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:12497-1 — kernel-devel-7.3.3-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:12497-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.3.3-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.3.3-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:12497-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-99239</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-99239</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 198 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: L2CAP: refuse __l2cap_chan_add if chan already has conn l2cap_chan may be linked to l2cap_conn at most once. This is assumed in several places, eg l2cap_chan_del cleanup. There is a TOCTOU race where the invariant is violated:     [Task 1]                          [Task 2]     l2cap_chan_connect                l2cap_sock_bind       l2cap_chan_lock                   lock_sock       l2cap_state_change                if (sk-&amp;gt;sk_state != BT_OPEN)         chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_CONNECT         l2cap_sock_state_change_cb      chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_BOUND                                         sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_BOUND           lock_sock &amp;lt;------------------ release_sock           sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_CONNECT l2cap_sock_connect() does not check sk-&amp;gt;sk_state, so since chan-&amp;gt;state is now BT_BOUND, subsequent connect() ends up with second __l2cap_chan_add. Explicitly document and check the invariant in __l2cap_chan_add with WARN_ON_ONCE. The only callsite where it could be hit is l2cap_chan_connect, so add pre-check there to avoid relying on chan-&amp;gt;state. chan-&amp;gt;state read/write is not properly guarded currently so there can be other TOCTOUC problems. Add l2cap_lock_chan in l2cap_sock_bind() to guard chan-&amp;gt;state write.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 198 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: L2CAP: refuse __l2cap_chan_add if chan already has conn l2cap_chan may be linked to l2cap_conn at most once. This is assumed in several places, eg l2cap_chan_del cleanup. There is a TOCTOU race where the invariant is violated:     [Task 1]                          [Task 2]     l2cap_chan_connect                l2cap_sock_bind       l2cap_chan_lock                   lock_sock       l2cap_state_change                if (sk-&amp;gt;sk_state != BT_OPEN)         chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_CONNECT         l2cap_sock_state_change_cb      chan-&amp;gt;state = BT_BOUND                                         sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_BOUND           lock_sock &amp;lt;------------------ release_sock           sk-&amp;gt;sk_state = BT_CONNECT l2cap_sock_connect() does not check sk-&amp;gt;sk_state, so since chan-&amp;gt;state is now BT_BOUND, subsequent connect() ends up with second __l2cap_chan_add. Explicitly document and check the invariant in __l2cap_chan_add with WARN_ON_ONCE. The only callsite where it could be hit is l2cap_chan_connect, so add pre-check there to avoid relying on chan-&amp;gt;state. chan-&amp;gt;state read/write is not properly guarded currently so there can be other TOCTOUC problems. Add l2cap_lock_chan in l2cap_sock_bind() to guard chan-&amp;gt;state write.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-99239</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-4302 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4302</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise die Auslösung eines Denial-of-Service-Angriffs, die Manipulation oder Offenlegung von Daten, die Ausführung von beliebigem Code, die Erlangung erweiterter Berechtigungen oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise die Auslösung eines Denial-of-Service-Angriffs, die Manipulation oder Offenlegung von Daten, die Ausführung von beliebigem Code, die Erlangung erweiterter Berechtigungen oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
