<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 18:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-mqg8-58gq-6w7m</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-mqg8-58gq-6w7m</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched_ext: Fix use-after-free of a destroyed user DSQ by a deferred reenqueue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A deferred reenqueue can read a freed user DSQ. The request stays on its
CPU&amp;#39;s deferred list until run_deferred() takes it, and the RCU callback that
frees the DSQ assumes that the grace period has flushed it, so exit_dsq()
checks the per-CPU node without the deferred list lock. A grace period waits
for readers in flight, not for a pending run_deferred(). A run_deferred()
which starts after the grace period began can detach the request right
before the callback looks and then read the freed DSQ&amp;#39;s id.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cancel the pending requests before the grace period instead. The irq work
that frees the DSQ unlinks every CPU&amp;#39;s request under the per-CPU deferred
list lock, and schedule_dsq_reenq() ignores a new request under the same
lock once the id is invalid. Only a run_deferred() that started before the
grace period can hold a request, and it runs with IRQs disabled, so the
grace period waits for it and nothing touches the DSQ after the callback.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched_ext: Fix use-after-free of a destroyed user DSQ by a deferred reenqueue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A deferred reenqueue can read a freed user DSQ. The request stays on its
CPU&amp;#39;s deferred list until run_deferred() takes it, and the RCU callback that
frees the DSQ assumes that the grace period has flushed it, so exit_dsq()
checks the per-CPU node without the deferred list lock. A grace period waits
for readers in flight, not for a pending run_deferred(). A run_deferred()
which starts after the grace period began can detach the request right
before the callback looks and then read the freed DSQ&amp;#39;s id.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cancel the pending requests before the grace period instead. The irq work
that frees the DSQ unlinks every CPU&amp;#39;s request under the per-CPU deferred
list lock, and schedule_dsq_reenq() ignores a new request under the same
lock once the id is invalid. Only a run_deferred() that started before the
grace period can hold a request, and it runs with IRQs disabled, so the
grace period waits for it and nothing touches the DSQ after the callback.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-mqg8-58gq-6w7m</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-99144</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-99144</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 257 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched_ext: Fix use-after-free of a destroyed user DSQ by a deferred reenqueue A deferred reenqueue can read a freed user DSQ. The request stays on its CPU&amp;#39;s deferred list until run_deferred() takes it, and the RCU callback that frees the DSQ assumes that the grace period has flushed it, so exit_dsq() checks the per-CPU node without the deferred list lock. A grace period waits for readers in flight, not for a pending run_deferred(). A run_deferred() which starts after the grace period began can detach the request right before the callback looks and then read the freed DSQ&amp;#39;s id. Cancel the pending requests before the grace period instead. The irq work that frees the DSQ unlinks every CPU&amp;#39;s request under the per-CPU deferred list lock, and schedule_dsq_reenq() ignores a new request under the same lock once the id is invalid. Only a run_deferred() that started before the grace period can hold a request, and it runs with IRQs disabled, so the grace period waits for it and nothing touches the DSQ after the callback.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 257 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched_ext: Fix use-after-free of a destroyed user DSQ by a deferred reenqueue A deferred reenqueue can read a freed user DSQ. The request stays on its CPU&amp;#39;s deferred list until run_deferred() takes it, and the RCU callback that frees the DSQ assumes that the grace period has flushed it, so exit_dsq() checks the per-CPU node without the deferred list lock. A grace period waits for readers in flight, not for a pending run_deferred(). A run_deferred() which starts after the grace period began can detach the request right before the callback looks and then read the freed DSQ&amp;#39;s id. Cancel the pending requests before the grace period instead. The irq work that frees the DSQ unlinks every CPU&amp;#39;s request under the per-CPU deferred list lock, and schedule_dsq_reenq() ignores a new request under the same lock once the id is invalid. Only a run_deferred() that started before the grace period can hold a request, and it runs with IRQs disabled, so the grace period waits for it and nothing touches the DSQ after the callback.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-99144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
