<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 14:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-99051</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99051</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fsverity: RCU-delay the freeing of struct fsverity_info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__fsverity_get_info() calls rhashtable_lookup_fast(), which just uses
rcu_read_lock() and doesn&amp;#39;t directly synchronize with
fsverity_remove_info().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the same inode this isn&amp;#39;t a problem: its fsverity_info is removed
only at inode eviction time or upon failure to enable verity, when the
inode no longer needs its fsverity_info and it will no longer be
accessed via that inode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this is broken and can cause a use-after-free for concurrent
__fsverity_get_info() for *different* inodes.  Those rely on following
fsverity_info::rhash_head in the rhashtable under rcu_read_lock() only.
They also use fsverity_info::inode to do the key comparison.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by RCU-delaying the freeing of &amp;#39;struct fsverity_info&amp;#39; after
it&amp;#39;s been removed from the rhashtable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fsverity: RCU-delay the freeing of struct fsverity_info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__fsverity_get_info() calls rhashtable_lookup_fast(), which just uses
rcu_read_lock() and doesn&amp;#39;t directly synchronize with
fsverity_remove_info().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the same inode this isn&amp;#39;t a problem: its fsverity_info is removed
only at inode eviction time or upon failure to enable verity, when the
inode no longer needs its fsverity_info and it will no longer be
accessed via that inode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this is broken and can cause a use-after-free for concurrent
__fsverity_get_info() for *different* inodes.  Those rely on following
fsverity_info::rhash_head in the rhashtable under rcu_read_lock() only.
They also use fsverity_info::inode to do the key comparison.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by RCU-delaying the freeing of &amp;#39;struct fsverity_info&amp;#39; after
it&amp;#39;s been removed from the rhashtable.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99051</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-7hq4-c7jg-2h9h</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-7hq4-c7jg-2h9h</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fsverity: RCU-delay the freeing of struct fsverity_info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__fsverity_get_info() calls rhashtable_lookup_fast(), which just uses
rcu_read_lock() and doesn&amp;#39;t directly synchronize with
fsverity_remove_info().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the same inode this isn&amp;#39;t a problem: its fsverity_info is removed
only at inode eviction time or upon failure to enable verity, when the
inode no longer needs its fsverity_info and it will no longer be
accessed via that inode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this is broken and can cause a use-after-free for concurrent
__fsverity_get_info() for *different* inodes.  Those rely on following
fsverity_info::rhash_head in the rhashtable under rcu_read_lock() only.
They also use fsverity_info::inode to do the key comparison.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by RCU-delaying the freeing of &amp;#39;struct fsverity_info&amp;#39; after
it&amp;#39;s been removed from the rhashtable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fsverity: RCU-delay the freeing of struct fsverity_info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__fsverity_get_info() calls rhashtable_lookup_fast(), which just uses
rcu_read_lock() and doesn&amp;#39;t directly synchronize with
fsverity_remove_info().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the same inode this isn&amp;#39;t a problem: its fsverity_info is removed
only at inode eviction time or upon failure to enable verity, when the
inode no longer needs its fsverity_info and it will no longer be
accessed via that inode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this is broken and can cause a use-after-free for concurrent
__fsverity_get_info() for *different* inodes.  Those rely on following
fsverity_info::rhash_head in the rhashtable under rcu_read_lock() only.
They also use fsverity_info::inode to do the key comparison.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by RCU-delaying the freeing of &amp;#39;struct fsverity_info&amp;#39; after
it&amp;#39;s been removed from the rhashtable.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-7hq4-c7jg-2h9h</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
