<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 23:42:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-98995</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98995</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: reset the old parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;overmount in mnt_change_mountpoint()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__umount_mnt() resets -&amp;gt;overmount of the parent when it unmounts the
mount that overmounts it. mnt_change_mountpoint() doesn&amp;#39;t. It moves the
mount to its new parent and leaves the old one pointing at it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a mount that is moved beneath in attach_recursive_mnt() that doesn&amp;#39;t
matter. The new mount has already reset -&amp;gt;overmount of the old parent by
the time the old top mount is moved onto it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It matters for reparent() though. propagate_umount() moves a surviving
overmount onto the first ancestor that isn&amp;#39;t going to be unmounted. The
mount it was taken from is unmounted immediately afterwards. If a file
descriptor keeps that unmounted mount alive -&amp;gt;overmount points at the
moved mount. That&amp;#39;s a dangling pointer and UAF as the moved mount is
unmounted and freed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;do_lock_mount() follows -&amp;gt;overmount from the target path under
mount_lock. With a file descriptor on such a mount as the target of a
mount beneath topmost_overmount() walks into the freed mount and
do_lock_mount() takes references on whatever it finds there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So reset -&amp;gt;overmount of the old parent in mnt_change_mountpoint() the
same way __umount_mnt() does. A mount&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;overmount is then always a
mount that is attached to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: reset the old parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;overmount in mnt_change_mountpoint()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__umount_mnt() resets -&amp;gt;overmount of the parent when it unmounts the
mount that overmounts it. mnt_change_mountpoint() doesn&amp;#39;t. It moves the
mount to its new parent and leaves the old one pointing at it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a mount that is moved beneath in attach_recursive_mnt() that doesn&amp;#39;t
matter. The new mount has already reset -&amp;gt;overmount of the old parent by
the time the old top mount is moved onto it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It matters for reparent() though. propagate_umount() moves a surviving
overmount onto the first ancestor that isn&amp;#39;t going to be unmounted. The
mount it was taken from is unmounted immediately afterwards. If a file
descriptor keeps that unmounted mount alive -&amp;gt;overmount points at the
moved mount. That&amp;#39;s a dangling pointer and UAF as the moved mount is
unmounted and freed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;do_lock_mount() follows -&amp;gt;overmount from the target path under
mount_lock. With a file descriptor on such a mount as the target of a
mount beneath topmost_overmount() walks into the freed mount and
do_lock_mount() takes references on whatever it finds there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So reset -&amp;gt;overmount of the old parent in mnt_change_mountpoint() the
same way __umount_mnt() does. A mount&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;overmount is then always a
mount that is attached to it.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98995</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-h4q9-qcg7-rj48</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-h4q9-qcg7-rj48</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: reset the old parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;overmount in mnt_change_mountpoint()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__umount_mnt() resets -&amp;gt;overmount of the parent when it unmounts the
mount that overmounts it. mnt_change_mountpoint() doesn&amp;#39;t. It moves the
mount to its new parent and leaves the old one pointing at it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a mount that is moved beneath in attach_recursive_mnt() that doesn&amp;#39;t
matter. The new mount has already reset -&amp;gt;overmount of the old parent by
the time the old top mount is moved onto it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It matters for reparent() though. propagate_umount() moves a surviving
overmount onto the first ancestor that isn&amp;#39;t going to be unmounted. The
mount it was taken from is unmounted immediately afterwards. If a file
descriptor keeps that unmounted mount alive -&amp;gt;overmount points at the
moved mount. That&amp;#39;s a dangling pointer and UAF as the moved mount is
unmounted and freed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;do_lock_mount() follows -&amp;gt;overmount from the target path under
mount_lock. With a file descriptor on such a mount as the target of a
mount beneath topmost_overmount() walks into the freed mount and
do_lock_mount() takes references on whatever it finds there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So reset -&amp;gt;overmount of the old parent in mnt_change_mountpoint() the
same way __umount_mnt() does. A mount&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;overmount is then always a
mount that is attached to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;namespace: reset the old parent&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;overmount in mnt_change_mountpoint()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__umount_mnt() resets -&amp;gt;overmount of the parent when it unmounts the
mount that overmounts it. mnt_change_mountpoint() doesn&amp;#39;t. It moves the
mount to its new parent and leaves the old one pointing at it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a mount that is moved beneath in attach_recursive_mnt() that doesn&amp;#39;t
matter. The new mount has already reset -&amp;gt;overmount of the old parent by
the time the old top mount is moved onto it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It matters for reparent() though. propagate_umount() moves a surviving
overmount onto the first ancestor that isn&amp;#39;t going to be unmounted. The
mount it was taken from is unmounted immediately afterwards. If a file
descriptor keeps that unmounted mount alive -&amp;gt;overmount points at the
moved mount. That&amp;#39;s a dangling pointer and UAF as the moved mount is
unmounted and freed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;do_lock_mount() follows -&amp;gt;overmount from the target path under
mount_lock. With a file descriptor on such a mount as the target of a
mount beneath topmost_overmount() walks into the freed mount and
do_lock_mount() takes references on whatever it finds there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So reset -&amp;gt;overmount of the old parent in mnt_change_mountpoint() the
same way __umount_mnt() does. A mount&amp;#39;s -&amp;gt;overmount is then always a
mount that is attached to it.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-h4q9-qcg7-rj48</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
