<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 17:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-98903</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98903</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mailbox: imx: Add a channel shutdown field&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko complained about possible teardown problem. The scenario&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU 0                              CPU 1
  imx_mu_isr()                   imx_mu_shutdown()
                                   imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv-&amp;gt;dcfg-&amp;gt;type, cp-&amp;gt;idx));
    imx_mu_specific_rx()
      imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv-&amp;gt;dcfg-&amp;gt;type, 0), 0);
                                   free_irq()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The RX event remains enabled because in this short window the RX event
was disabled in -&amp;gt;shutdown() while the interrupt was active and then
enabled again by the ISR while -&amp;gt;shutdown waited in free_irq().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This race requires timing and if happens can be problematic on shared
handlers if the &amp;#34;removed&amp;#34; channel triggers an interrupt. In this case
the irq-core will shutdown the interrupt with the &amp;#34;nobody cared&amp;#34;
message.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Introduce imx_mu_con_priv::shutdown to signal that the channel is
shutting down. This flag is set with the lock held (by
imx_mu_xcr_clr_shut()). The unmask side uses imx_mu_xcr_set_act() which
only enables the event if the channel has not been shutdown and
serialises on the same lock.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mailbox: imx: Add a channel shutdown field&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko complained about possible teardown problem. The scenario&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU 0                              CPU 1
  imx_mu_isr()                   imx_mu_shutdown()
                                   imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv-&amp;gt;dcfg-&amp;gt;type, cp-&amp;gt;idx));
    imx_mu_specific_rx()
      imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv-&amp;gt;dcfg-&amp;gt;type, 0), 0);
                                   free_irq()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The RX event remains enabled because in this short window the RX event
was disabled in -&amp;gt;shutdown() while the interrupt was active and then
enabled again by the ISR while -&amp;gt;shutdown waited in free_irq().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This race requires timing and if happens can be problematic on shared
handlers if the &amp;#34;removed&amp;#34; channel triggers an interrupt. In this case
the irq-core will shutdown the interrupt with the &amp;#34;nobody cared&amp;#34;
message.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Introduce imx_mu_con_priv::shutdown to signal that the channel is
shutting down. This flag is set with the lock held (by
imx_mu_xcr_clr_shut()). The unmask side uses imx_mu_xcr_set_act() which
only enables the event if the channel has not been shutdown and
serialises on the same lock.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98903</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6pc9-8xrq-jmj4</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-6pc9-8xrq-jmj4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mailbox: imx: Add a channel shutdown field&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko complained about possible teardown problem. The scenario&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU 0                              CPU 1
  imx_mu_isr()                   imx_mu_shutdown()
                                   imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv-&amp;gt;dcfg-&amp;gt;type, cp-&amp;gt;idx));
    imx_mu_specific_rx()
      imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv-&amp;gt;dcfg-&amp;gt;type, 0), 0);
                                   free_irq()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The RX event remains enabled because in this short window the RX event
was disabled in -&amp;gt;shutdown() while the interrupt was active and then
enabled again by the ISR while -&amp;gt;shutdown waited in free_irq().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This race requires timing and if happens can be problematic on shared
handlers if the &amp;#34;removed&amp;#34; channel triggers an interrupt. In this case
the irq-core will shutdown the interrupt with the &amp;#34;nobody cared&amp;#34;
message.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Introduce imx_mu_con_priv::shutdown to signal that the channel is
shutting down. This flag is set with the lock held (by
imx_mu_xcr_clr_shut()). The unmask side uses imx_mu_xcr_set_act() which
only enables the event if the channel has not been shutdown and
serialises on the same lock.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mailbox: imx: Add a channel shutdown field&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko complained about possible teardown problem. The scenario&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU 0                              CPU 1
  imx_mu_isr()                   imx_mu_shutdown()
                                   imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv-&amp;gt;dcfg-&amp;gt;type, cp-&amp;gt;idx));
    imx_mu_specific_rx()
      imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv-&amp;gt;dcfg-&amp;gt;type, 0), 0);
                                   free_irq()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The RX event remains enabled because in this short window the RX event
was disabled in -&amp;gt;shutdown() while the interrupt was active and then
enabled again by the ISR while -&amp;gt;shutdown waited in free_irq().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This race requires timing and if happens can be problematic on shared
handlers if the &amp;#34;removed&amp;#34; channel triggers an interrupt. In this case
the irq-core will shutdown the interrupt with the &amp;#34;nobody cared&amp;#34;
message.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Introduce imx_mu_con_priv::shutdown to signal that the channel is
shutting down. This flag is set with the lock held (by
imx_mu_xcr_clr_shut()). The unmask side uses imx_mu_xcr_set_act() which
only enables the event if the channel has not been shutdown and
serialises on the same lock.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-6pc9-8xrq-jmj4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98903 — mailbox: imx: Add a channel shutdown field</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98903</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-98903</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
