https://db.gcve.eu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Tue, 03 Nov 2026 07:22:07 +0000 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98714 <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>KVM: SVM: Update control fields on #VMEXIT if and only if VMRUN succeeded</p> <p>Leave control.erap_ctl and control.clean as-is in the VMCS if VMRUN fails, because as per AMD:</p> <p>there&#39;s no explicit architectural guarantee about the behavior in the presence of VMRUN failures. So the best thing to do would be to assume that if VMRUN fails, the actions requested in the control fields may not have been performed.</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>KVM: SVM: Update control fields on #VMEXIT if and only if VMRUN succeeded</p> <p>Leave control.erap_ctl and control.clean as-is in the VMCS if VMRUN fails, because as per AMD:</p> <p>there&#39;s no explicit architectural guarantee about the behavior in the presence of VMRUN failures. So the best thing to do would be to assume that if VMRUN fails, the actions requested in the control fields may not have been performed.</p> https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98714 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rrqj-3q8v-92j9 <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>KVM: SVM: Update control fields on #VMEXIT if and only if VMRUN succeeded</p> <p>Leave control.erap_ctl and control.clean as-is in the VMCS if VMRUN fails, because as per AMD:</p> <p>there&#39;s no explicit architectural guarantee about the behavior in the presence of VMRUN failures. So the best thing to do would be to assume that if VMRUN fails, the actions requested in the control fields may not have been performed.</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>KVM: SVM: Update control fields on #VMEXIT if and only if VMRUN succeeded</p> <p>Leave control.erap_ctl and control.clean as-is in the VMCS if VMRUN fails, because as per AMD:</p> <p>there&#39;s no explicit architectural guarantee about the behavior in the presence of VMRUN failures. So the best thing to do would be to assume that if VMRUN fails, the actions requested in the control fields may not have been performed.</p> https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rrqj-3q8v-92j9 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98714 msrc_CVE-2026-98714 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98714 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98714 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 248 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Update control fields on #VMEXIT if and only if VMRUN succeeded Leave control.erap_ctl and control.clean as-is in the VMCS if VMRUN fails, because as per AMD: there&#39;s no explicit architectural guarantee about the behavior in the presence of VMRUN failures. So the best thing to do would be to assume that if VMRUN fails, the actions requested in the control fields may not have been performed.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 248 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Update control fields on #VMEXIT if and only if VMRUN succeeded Leave control.erap_ctl and control.clean as-is in the VMCS if VMRUN fails, because as per AMD: there&#39;s no explicit architectural guarantee about the behavior in the presence of VMRUN failures. So the best thing to do would be to assume that if VMRUN fails, the actions requested in the control fields may not have been performed.</p> https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98714 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4019 <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise einen Denial-of-Service-Angriff auszulösen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.</p> <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise einen Denial-of-Service-Angriff auszulösen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.</p> https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4019