<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 21:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-98584</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98584</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;em_text_dump() allocates struct tcf_em_text on the stack without zeroing
it.  strscpy() writes the algorithm name and a NUL terminator into
conf.algo[], leaving the remaining bytes uninitialised.  nla_put_nohdr()
then copies the full struct to the netlink response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KMSAN on Linux 7.2-rc6 reports two kernel-infoleak splats from this path,
one triggered via &amp;#34;tc filter show&amp;#34; and one via a raw RTM_GETTFILTER dump:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x1c9/0x2620
    nla_put_nohdr+0x83/0x130
    em_text_dump+0x291/0x550
  Local variable conf created at: em_text_dump+0x5d/0x550
  Bytes 168-179 of 199 are uninitialized&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not certain whether this constitutes a real security problem in
practice: the test was conducted in a controlled KMSAN environment and
the leaked stack bytes may or may not carry sensitive data on actual
production kernels.  I am reporting it because KMSAN flagged it as a
kernel-infoleak and the fix is straightforward.  I can provide a
userspace reproducer on request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The original code used strncpy() which zero-pads to the destination size.
Commit b04202d6065c (&amp;#34;net/sched: replace strncpy with strscpy&amp;#34;) replaced
it with strscpy(), which does not pad, creating this condition.
Zero-initialising the struct closes it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;em_text_dump() allocates struct tcf_em_text on the stack without zeroing
it.  strscpy() writes the algorithm name and a NUL terminator into
conf.algo[], leaving the remaining bytes uninitialised.  nla_put_nohdr()
then copies the full struct to the netlink response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KMSAN on Linux 7.2-rc6 reports two kernel-infoleak splats from this path,
one triggered via &amp;#34;tc filter show&amp;#34; and one via a raw RTM_GETTFILTER dump:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x1c9/0x2620
    nla_put_nohdr+0x83/0x130
    em_text_dump+0x291/0x550
  Local variable conf created at: em_text_dump+0x5d/0x550
  Bytes 168-179 of 199 are uninitialized&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not certain whether this constitutes a real security problem in
practice: the test was conducted in a controlled KMSAN environment and
the leaked stack bytes may or may not carry sensitive data on actual
production kernels.  I am reporting it because KMSAN flagged it as a
kernel-infoleak and the fix is straightforward.  I can provide a
userspace reproducer on request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The original code used strncpy() which zero-pads to the destination size.
Commit b04202d6065c (&amp;#34;net/sched: replace strncpy with strscpy&amp;#34;) replaced
it with strscpy(), which does not pad, creating this condition.
Zero-initialising the struct closes it.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98584</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-r555-rgvq-cqv7</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-r555-rgvq-cqv7</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;em_text_dump() allocates struct tcf_em_text on the stack without zeroing
it.  strscpy() writes the algorithm name and a NUL terminator into
conf.algo[], leaving the remaining bytes uninitialised.  nla_put_nohdr()
then copies the full struct to the netlink response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KMSAN on Linux 7.2-rc6 reports two kernel-infoleak splats from this path,
one triggered via &amp;#34;tc filter show&amp;#34; and one via a raw RTM_GETTFILTER dump:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x1c9/0x2620
    nla_put_nohdr+0x83/0x130
    em_text_dump+0x291/0x550
  Local variable conf created at: em_text_dump+0x5d/0x550
  Bytes 168-179 of 199 are uninitialized&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not certain whether this constitutes a real security problem in
practice: the test was conducted in a controlled KMSAN environment and
the leaked stack bytes may or may not carry sensitive data on actual
production kernels.  I am reporting it because KMSAN flagged it as a
kernel-infoleak and the fix is straightforward.  I can provide a
userspace reproducer on request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The original code used strncpy() which zero-pads to the destination size.
Commit b04202d6065c (&amp;#34;net/sched: replace strncpy with strscpy&amp;#34;) replaced
it with strscpy(), which does not pad, creating this condition.
Zero-initialising the struct closes it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;em_text_dump() allocates struct tcf_em_text on the stack without zeroing
it.  strscpy() writes the algorithm name and a NUL terminator into
conf.algo[], leaving the remaining bytes uninitialised.  nla_put_nohdr()
then copies the full struct to the netlink response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KMSAN on Linux 7.2-rc6 reports two kernel-infoleak splats from this path,
one triggered via &amp;#34;tc filter show&amp;#34; and one via a raw RTM_GETTFILTER dump:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x1c9/0x2620
    nla_put_nohdr+0x83/0x130
    em_text_dump+0x291/0x550
  Local variable conf created at: em_text_dump+0x5d/0x550
  Bytes 168-179 of 199 are uninitialized&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not certain whether this constitutes a real security problem in
practice: the test was conducted in a controlled KMSAN environment and
the leaked stack bytes may or may not carry sensitive data on actual
production kernels.  I am reporting it because KMSAN flagged it as a
kernel-infoleak and the fix is straightforward.  I can provide a
userspace reproducer on request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The original code used strncpy() which zero-pads to the destination size.
Commit b04202d6065c (&amp;#34;net/sched: replace strncpy with strscpy&amp;#34;) replaced
it with strscpy(), which does not pad, creating this condition.
Zero-initialising the struct closes it.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-r555-rgvq-cqv7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98584 — net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump()</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98584</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-98584</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98584</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98584</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98584</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 120 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump() em_text_dump() allocates struct tcf_em_text on the stack without zeroing it.  strscpy() writes the algorithm name and a NUL terminator into conf.algo[], leaving the remaining bytes uninitialised.  nla_put_nohdr() then copies the full struct to the netlink response. KMSAN on Linux 7.2-rc6 reports two kernel-infoleak splats from this path, one triggered via &amp;#34;tc filter show&amp;#34; and one via a raw RTM_GETTFILTER dump:   BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x1c9/0x2620     nla_put_nohdr+0x83/0x130     em_text_dump+0x291/0x550   Local variable conf created at: em_text_dump+0x5d/0x550   Bytes 168-179 of 199 are uninitialized I am not certain whether this constitutes a real security problem in practice: the test was conducted in a controlled KMSAN environment and the leaked stack bytes may or may not carry sensitive data on actual production kernels.  I am reporting it because KMSAN flagged it as a kernel-infoleak and the fix is straightforward.  I can provide a userspace reproducer on request. The original code used strncpy() which zero-pads to the destination size. Commit b04202d6065c (&amp;#34;net/sched: replace strncpy with strscpy&amp;#34;) replaced it with strscpy(), which does not pad, creating this condition. Zero-initialising the struct closes it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 120 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: fix potential stack infoleak in em_text_dump() em_text_dump() allocates struct tcf_em_text on the stack without zeroing it.  strscpy() writes the algorithm name and a NUL terminator into conf.algo[], leaving the remaining bytes uninitialised.  nla_put_nohdr() then copies the full struct to the netlink response. KMSAN on Linux 7.2-rc6 reports two kernel-infoleak splats from this path, one triggered via &amp;#34;tc filter show&amp;#34; and one via a raw RTM_GETTFILTER dump:   BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x1c9/0x2620     nla_put_nohdr+0x83/0x130     em_text_dump+0x291/0x550   Local variable conf created at: em_text_dump+0x5d/0x550   Bytes 168-179 of 199 are uninitialized I am not certain whether this constitutes a real security problem in practice: the test was conducted in a controlled KMSAN environment and the leaked stack bytes may or may not carry sensitive data on actual production kernels.  I am reporting it because KMSAN flagged it as a kernel-infoleak and the fix is straightforward.  I can provide a userspace reproducer on request. The original code used strncpy() which zero-pads to the destination size. Commit b04202d6065c (&amp;#34;net/sched: replace strncpy with strscpy&amp;#34;) replaced it with strscpy(), which does not pad, creating this condition. Zero-initialising the struct closes it.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98584</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-4019 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4019</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise einen Denial-of-Service-Angriff auszulösen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise einen Denial-of-Service-Angriff auszulösen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
