<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 21:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1375 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à…</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1375</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1375</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1375</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-98547</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98547</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_packet: fix integer overflow in prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo() computes in 32-bit int arithmetic:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mbits = (blk_size_in_bytes * 8) / (1024 * 1024);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I&amp;#39;m reading the validation right, tp_block_size is user
controlled and packet_set_ring() only rejects values that are &amp;lt;= 0
as int or not page aligned, so a 256MiB block goes right through
(and alloc_one_pg_vec_page() even has a vzalloc fallback for it).
0x10000000 * 8 wraps to INT_MIN, and on a NIC reporting 1 Gbps
(div == 1) the function ends up returning -2047.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The condition is actually (8 * size) mod 2^32 &amp;gt;= 2^31 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; div == 1,
so the trigger set is [256,512), [768,1024), [1280,1536) and
[1792,2048) MiB. Other sizes wrap to non-negative values and faster
links divide the unsigned value back below 2^31, which is why this
doesn&amp;#39;t blow up for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What makes it fatal is what happens next in init_prb_bdqc():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime = ms_to_ktime(prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo(...));
        hrtimer_start(&amp;amp;p1-&amp;gt;retire_blk_timer, p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime,
                      HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A negative relative timeout expires immediately. The callback
unconditionally returns HRTIMER_RESTART, and hrtimer_forward() turns
the negative interval into hrtimer_resolution:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (interval &amp;lt; hrtimer_resolution)
                interval = hrtimer_resolution;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the SOFT timer re-fires at the maximum rate forever, holding
sk_r…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_packet: fix integer overflow in prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo() computes in 32-bit int arithmetic:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mbits = (blk_size_in_bytes * 8) / (1024 * 1024);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I&amp;#39;m reading the validation right, tp_block_size is user
controlled and packet_set_ring() only rejects values that are &amp;lt;= 0
as int or not page aligned, so a 256MiB block goes right through
(and alloc_one_pg_vec_page() even has a vzalloc fallback for it).
0x10000000 * 8 wraps to INT_MIN, and on a NIC reporting 1 Gbps
(div == 1) the function ends up returning -2047.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The condition is actually (8 * size) mod 2^32 &amp;gt;= 2^31 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; div == 1,
so the trigger set is [256,512), [768,1024), [1280,1536) and
[1792,2048) MiB. Other sizes wrap to non-negative values and faster
links divide the unsigned value back below 2^31, which is why this
doesn&amp;#39;t blow up for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What makes it fatal is what happens next in init_prb_bdqc():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime = ms_to_ktime(prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo(...));
        hrtimer_start(&amp;amp;p1-&amp;gt;retire_blk_timer, p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime,
                      HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A negative relative timeout expires immediately. The callback
unconditionally returns HRTIMER_RESTART, and hrtimer_forward() turns
the negative interval into hrtimer_resolution:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (interval &amp;lt; hrtimer_resolution)
                interval = hrtimer_resolution;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the SOFT timer re-fires at the maximum rate forever, holding
sk_r…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98547</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-9w5q-r82v-2r6x</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-9w5q-r82v-2r6x</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_packet: fix integer overflow in prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo() computes in 32-bit int arithmetic:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mbits = (blk_size_in_bytes * 8) / (1024 * 1024);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I&amp;#39;m reading the validation right, tp_block_size is user
controlled and packet_set_ring() only rejects values that are &amp;lt;= 0
as int or not page aligned, so a 256MiB block goes right through
(and alloc_one_pg_vec_page() even has a vzalloc fallback for it).
0x10000000 * 8 wraps to INT_MIN, and on a NIC reporting 1 Gbps
(div == 1) the function ends up returning -2047.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The condition is actually (8 * size) mod 2^32 &amp;gt;= 2^31 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; div == 1,
so the trigger set is [256,512), [768,1024), [1280,1536) and
[1792,2048) MiB. Other sizes wrap to non-negative values and faster
links divide the unsigned value back below 2^31, which is why this
doesn&amp;#39;t blow up for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What makes it fatal is what happens next in init_prb_bdqc():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime = ms_to_ktime(prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo(...));
        hrtimer_start(&amp;amp;p1-&amp;gt;retire_blk_timer, p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime,
                      HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A negative relative timeout expires immediately. The callback
unconditionally returns HRTIMER_RESTART, and hrtimer_forward() turns
the negative interval into hrtimer_resolution:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (interval &amp;lt; hrtimer_resolution)
                interval = hrtimer_resolution;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the SOFT timer re-fires at the maximum rate forever, holding
sk_r…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_packet: fix integer overflow in prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo() computes in 32-bit int arithmetic:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mbits = (blk_size_in_bytes * 8) / (1024 * 1024);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I&amp;#39;m reading the validation right, tp_block_size is user
controlled and packet_set_ring() only rejects values that are &amp;lt;= 0
as int or not page aligned, so a 256MiB block goes right through
(and alloc_one_pg_vec_page() even has a vzalloc fallback for it).
0x10000000 * 8 wraps to INT_MIN, and on a NIC reporting 1 Gbps
(div == 1) the function ends up returning -2047.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The condition is actually (8 * size) mod 2^32 &amp;gt;= 2^31 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; div == 1,
so the trigger set is [256,512), [768,1024), [1280,1536) and
[1792,2048) MiB. Other sizes wrap to non-negative values and faster
links divide the unsigned value back below 2^31, which is why this
doesn&amp;#39;t blow up for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What makes it fatal is what happens next in init_prb_bdqc():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime = ms_to_ktime(prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo(...));
        hrtimer_start(&amp;amp;p1-&amp;gt;retire_blk_timer, p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime,
                      HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A negative relative timeout expires immediately. The callback
unconditionally returns HRTIMER_RESTART, and hrtimer_forward() turns
the negative interval into hrtimer_resolution:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (interval &amp;lt; hrtimer_resolution)
                interval = hrtimer_resolution;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the SOFT timer re-fires at the maximum rate forever, holding
sk_r…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-9w5q-r82v-2r6x</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98547 — af_packet: fix integer overflow in prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo()</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98547</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-98547</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98547</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98547</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98547</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 248 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_packet: fix integer overflow in prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo() prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo() computes in 32-bit int arithmetic:         mbits = (blk_size_in_bytes * 8) / (1024 * 1024); If I&amp;#39;m reading the validation right, tp_block_size is user controlled and packet_set_ring() only rejects values that are &amp;lt;= 0 as int or not page aligned, so a 256MiB block goes right through (and alloc_one_pg_vec_page() even has a vzalloc fallback for it). 0x10000000 * 8 wraps to INT_MIN, and on a NIC reporting 1 Gbps (div == 1) the function ends up returning -2047. The condition is actually (8 * size) mod 2^32 &amp;gt;= 2^31 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; div == 1, so the trigger set is [256,512), [768,1024), [1280,1536) and [1792,2048) MiB. Other sizes wrap to non-negative values and faster links divide the unsigned value back below 2^31, which is why this doesn&amp;#39;t blow up for everyone. What makes it fatal is what happens next in init_prb_bdqc():         p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime = ms_to_ktime(prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo(...));         hrtimer_start(&amp;amp;p1-&amp;gt;retire_blk_timer, p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime,                       HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT); A negative relative timeout expires immediately. The callback unconditionally returns HRTIMER_RESTART, and hrtimer_forward() turns the negative interval into hrtimer_resolution:         if (interval &amp;lt; hrtimer_resolution)                 interval = hrtimer_resolution; So the SOFT timer re-fires at the maximum rate forever, holding sk_receive_que…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 248 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_packet: fix integer overflow in prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo() prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo() computes in 32-bit int arithmetic:         mbits = (blk_size_in_bytes * 8) / (1024 * 1024); If I&amp;#39;m reading the validation right, tp_block_size is user controlled and packet_set_ring() only rejects values that are &amp;lt;= 0 as int or not page aligned, so a 256MiB block goes right through (and alloc_one_pg_vec_page() even has a vzalloc fallback for it). 0x10000000 * 8 wraps to INT_MIN, and on a NIC reporting 1 Gbps (div == 1) the function ends up returning -2047. The condition is actually (8 * size) mod 2^32 &amp;gt;= 2^31 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; div == 1, so the trigger set is [256,512), [768,1024), [1280,1536) and [1792,2048) MiB. Other sizes wrap to non-negative values and faster links divide the unsigned value back below 2^31, which is why this doesn&amp;#39;t blow up for everyone. What makes it fatal is what happens next in init_prb_bdqc():         p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime = ms_to_ktime(prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo(...));         hrtimer_start(&amp;amp;p1-&amp;gt;retire_blk_timer, p1-&amp;gt;interval_ktime,                       HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT); A negative relative timeout expires immediately. The callback unconditionally returns HRTIMER_RESTART, and hrtimer_forward() turns the negative interval into hrtimer_resolution:         if (interval &amp;lt; hrtimer_resolution)                 interval = hrtimer_resolution; So the SOFT timer re-fires at the maximum rate forever, holding sk_receive_que…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
