https://db.gcve.eu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Fri, 13 Nov 2026 04:46:51 +0000 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97037 <p>Building a malicious package that uses cgo could cause arbitrary code execution at link time by passing linker script files to the host linker via &#34;#cgo LDFLAGS&#34;. Split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags that consume a following argument (such as &#34;-Wl,-rpath&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, and &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;) previously accepted a bare second argument without a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix, which the compiler driver passes directly to the linker as a positional input file. Additionally, when using GNU ld.bfd, flags such as &#34;-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-subsystem&#34;, and (on non-Darwin platforms) &#34;-Wl,-sectcreate&#34; could cause ld.bfd to interpret their arguments as linker scripts if they named a regular file on disk. The go command now requires a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix on the second token of split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags (except &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;), verifies that these flags do not reference linker script files, and disallows bare &#34;-Wl,--warn-backrefs-exclude&#34;.</p> <p>Building a malicious package that uses cgo could cause arbitrary code execution at link time by passing linker script files to the host linker via &#34;#cgo LDFLAGS&#34;. Split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags that consume a following argument (such as &#34;-Wl,-rpath&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, and &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;) previously accepted a bare second argument without a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix, which the compiler driver passes directly to the linker as a positional input file. Additionally, when using GNU ld.bfd, flags such as &#34;-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-subsystem&#34;, and (on non-Darwin platforms) &#34;-Wl,-sectcreate&#34; could cause ld.bfd to interpret their arguments as linker scripts if they named a regular file on disk. The go command now requires a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix on the second token of split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags (except &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;), verifies that these flags do not reference linker script files, and disallows bare &#34;-Wl,--warn-backrefs-exclude&#34;.</p> https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97037 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-f47v-97w8-qc5g <p>Building a malicious package that uses cgo could cause arbitrary code execution at link time by passing linker script files to the host linker via &#34;#cgo LDFLAGS&#34;. Split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags that consume a following argument (such as &#34;-Wl,-rpath&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, and &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;) previously accepted a bare second argument without a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix, which the compiler driver passes directly to the linker as a positional input file. Additionally, when using GNU ld.bfd, flags such as &#34;-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-subsystem&#34;, and (on non-Darwin platforms) &#34;-Wl,-sectcreate&#34; could cause ld.bfd to interpret their arguments as linker scripts if they named a regular file on disk. The go command now requires a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix on the second token of split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags (except &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;), verifies that these flags do not reference linker script files, and disallows bare &#34;-Wl,--warn-backrefs-exclude&#34;.</p> <p>Building a malicious package that uses cgo could cause arbitrary code execution at link time by passing linker script files to the host linker via &#34;#cgo LDFLAGS&#34;. Split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags that consume a following argument (such as &#34;-Wl,-rpath&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, and &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;) previously accepted a bare second argument without a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix, which the compiler driver passes directly to the linker as a positional input file. Additionally, when using GNU ld.bfd, flags such as &#34;-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-subsystem&#34;, and (on non-Darwin platforms) &#34;-Wl,-sectcreate&#34; could cause ld.bfd to interpret their arguments as linker scripts if they named a regular file on disk. The go command now requires a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix on the second token of split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags (except &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;), verifies that these flags do not reference linker script files, and disallows bare &#34;-Wl,--warn-backrefs-exclude&#34;.</p> https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-f47v-97w8-qc5g https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:12529-1 <p>go1.26-1.26.11-1.1 on GA media</p> <p>go1.26-1.26.11-1.1 on GA media</p> https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:12529-1 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97037 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:14.04:LTS: golang-1.10, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: golang-1.10, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: golang-1.6, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: golang-1.13, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: golang-1.18, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: golang-1.10, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: golang-1.13, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: golang-1.16, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: golang-1.18, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: golang-1.8 and 30 more</p> <p>Building a malicious package that uses cgo could cause arbitrary code execution at link time by passing linker script files to the host linker via &#34;#cgo LDFLAGS&#34;. Split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags that consume a following argument (such as &#34;-Wl,-rpath&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, and &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;) previously accepted a bare second argument without a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix, which the compiler driver passes directly to the linker as a positional input file. Additionally, when using GNU ld.bfd, flags such as &#34;-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-subsystem&#34;, and (on non-Darwin platforms) &#34;-Wl,-sectcreate&#34; could cause ld.bfd to interpret their arguments as linker scripts if they named a regular file on disk. The go command now requires a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix on the second token of split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags (except &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;), verifies that these flags do not reference linker script files, and disallows bare &#34;-Wl,--warn-backrefs-exclude&#34;.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:14.04:LTS: golang-1.10, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: golang-1.10, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: golang-1.6, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: golang-1.13, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: golang-1.18, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: golang-1.10, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: golang-1.13, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: golang-1.16, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: golang-1.18, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: golang-1.8 and 30 more</p> <p>Building a malicious package that uses cgo could cause arbitrary code execution at link time by passing linker script files to the host linker via &#34;#cgo LDFLAGS&#34;. Split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags that consume a following argument (such as &#34;-Wl,-rpath&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, and &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;) previously accepted a bare second argument without a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix, which the compiler driver passes directly to the linker as a positional input file. Additionally, when using GNU ld.bfd, flags such as &#34;-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-framework&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-undefined&#34;, &#34;-Wl,--just-symbols&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;, &#34;-Wl,-subsystem&#34;, and (on non-Darwin platforms) &#34;-Wl,-sectcreate&#34; could cause ld.bfd to interpret their arguments as linker scripts if they named a regular file on disk. The go command now requires a &#34;-Wl,&#34; prefix on the second token of split &#34;-Wl,&#34; flags (except &#34;-Wl,-R&#34;), verifies that these flags do not reference linker script files, and disallows bare &#34;-Wl,--warn-backrefs-exclude&#34;.</p> https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97037 https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4370 <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Golang Go ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p> <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Golang Go ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p> https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-4370