<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 13:19:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-84783</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-84783</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by
several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while
another thread is still using it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded
TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client
certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA
certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a
use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a
Denial of Service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate&amp;#39;s X.509v3
extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In
OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are
computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are
then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock
does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for
the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently
acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values
installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has
already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it
to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its
extensions are decoded. In TLS the ce…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by
several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while
another thread is still using it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded
TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client
certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA
certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a
use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a
Denial of Service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate&amp;#39;s X.509v3
extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In
OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are
computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are
then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock
does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for
the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently
acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values
installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has
already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it
to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its
extensions are decoded. In TLS the ce…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-84783</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by
several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while
another thread is still using it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded
TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client
certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA
certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a
use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a
Denial of Service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate&amp;#39;s X.509v3
extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In
OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are
computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are
then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock
does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for
the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently
acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values
installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has
already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it
to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its
extensions are decoded. In TLS the ce…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by
several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while
another thread is still using it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded
TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client
certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA
certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a
use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a
Denial of Service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate&amp;#39;s X.509v3
extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In
OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are
computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are
then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock
does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for
the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently
acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values
installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has
already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it
to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its
extensions are decoded. In TLS the ce…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:59641 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rhsa-2026:59641</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler openssl: Double-free When Checking OCSP Stapled Response openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling openssl: NULL Dereference in Certificate Verification with OCSP Checking openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q openssl: Possible Out of Bounds Read in X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_email() openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_veri…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler openssl: Double-free When Checking OCSP Stapled Response openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling openssl: NULL Dereference in Certificate Verification with OCSP Checking openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q openssl: Possible Out of Bounds Read in X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_email() openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_veri…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rhsa-2026:59641</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-84783</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-84783</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS: nodejs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS: nodejs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-84783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
