<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2026 00:37:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BREW-aider-GHSA-2g87-pp6c-29x5 — aiohttp: Multiple instances of excessive or unbounded memory/CPU use</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/brew-aider-ghsa-2g87-pp6c-29x5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Homebrew: aider&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While reassembling a WebSocket frame that arrived across many small transport reads, the reader kept one `bytes` object per read with no bound on the count. The per-object overhead is many times larger than the payload bytes, so a frame delivered a few bytes at a time could use far more memory than `max_msg_size` allows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker could cause excessive memory use in a WebSocket server, or a malicious server against a client, by sending a frame in a large number of tiny segments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Homebrew: aider&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While reassembling a WebSocket frame that arrived across many small transport reads, the reader kept one `bytes` object per read with no bound on the count. The per-object overhead is many times larger than the payload bytes, so a frame delivered a few bytes at a time could use far more memory than `max_msg_size` allows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker could cause excessive memory use in a WebSocket server, or a malicious server against a client, by sending a frame in a large number of tiny segments.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/brew-aider-ghsa-2g87-pp6c-29x5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-123817</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-123817</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, the WebSocket reader retains one bytes object for each transport read while reassembling an incomplete frame. A malicious peer can split a frame into many tiny reads so per-object overhead substantially exceeds the payload bytes allowed by max_msg_size. The condition affects a server receiving frames from a malicious client and a client receiving frames from a malicious server, and can cause excessive memory consumption or denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.4, the WebSocket reader retains one bytes object for each transport read while reassembling an incomplete frame. A malicious peer can split a frame into many tiny reads so per-object overhead substantially exceeds the payload bytes allowed by max_msg_size. The condition affects a server receiving frames from a malicious client and a client receiving frames from a malicious server, and can cause excessive memory consumption or denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.14.4.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-123817</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-2g87-pp6c-29x5 — aiohttp: Multiple instances of excessive or unbounded memory/CPU use</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-2g87-pp6c-29x5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: aiohttp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While reassembling a WebSocket frame that arrived across many small transport reads, the reader kept one `bytes` object per read with no bound on the count. The per-object overhead is many times larger than the payload bytes, so a frame delivered a few bytes at a time could use far more memory than `max_msg_size` allows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker could cause excessive memory use in a WebSocket server, or a malicious server against a client, by sending a frame in a large number of tiny segments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: aiohttp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While reassembling a WebSocket frame that arrived across many small transport reads, the reader kept one `bytes` object per read with no bound on the count. The per-object overhead is many times larger than the payload bytes, so a frame delivered a few bytes at a time could use far more memory than `max_msg_size` allows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An attacker could cause excessive memory use in a WebSocket server, or a malicious server against a client, by sending a frame in a large number of tiny segments.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-2g87-pp6c-29x5</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
