<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 23:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-123613</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-123613</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Rustls from 0.23.13 before 0.23.45 accepts TLS 1.3 handshake messages at the wrong encryption level when they follow a key-changing message in the same record, because Deframer::aligned does not enforce RFC 8446 record-boundary alignment. A peer or on-path attacker can pack a plaintext EncryptedExtensions with the ServerHello, which rustls accepts unencrypted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Rustls from 0.23.13 before 0.23.45 accepts TLS 1.3 handshake messages at the wrong encryption level when they follow a key-changing message in the same record, because Deframer::aligned does not enforce RFC 8446 record-boundary alignment. A peer or on-path attacker can pack a plaintext EncryptedExtensions with the ServerHello, which rustls accepts unencrypted.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-123613</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-rp7q-jxfg-4g6g</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rp7q-jxfg-4g6g</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Rustls from 0.23.13 before 0.23.45 accepts TLS 1.3 handshake messages at the wrong encryption level when they follow a key-changing message in the same record, because Deframer::aligned does not enforce RFC 8446 record-boundary alignment. A peer or on-path attacker can pack a plaintext EncryptedExtensions with the ServerHello, which rustls accepts unencrypted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Rustls from 0.23.13 before 0.23.45 accepts TLS 1.3 handshake messages at the wrong encryption level when they follow a key-changing message in the same record, because Deframer::aligned does not enforce RFC 8446 record-boundary alignment. A peer or on-path attacker can pack a plaintext EncryptedExtensions with the ServerHello, which rustls accepts unencrypted.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rp7q-jxfg-4g6g</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RUSTSEC-2026-0285 — TLS 1.3 handshake messages incorrectly accepted across encryption level boundaries</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rustsec-2026-0285</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: rustls&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rustls accepted TLS 1.3 handshake messages sent at the wrong encryption level
when they followed a key-changing message in the same record. For example,
a plaintext `EncryptedExtensions` message packed into the same record as the
`ServerHello` was accepted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 8446 section 5.1 requires that handshake messages do not span key changes,
and that implementations terminate the connection with an &amp;#34;unexpected_message&amp;#34;
alert if they do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The handshake transcript is still authenticated, so a network-position attacker
cannot use this to alter or complete a handshake; the practical effect is that
a peer could send handshake messages that should be encrypted in plaintext
without rustls rejecting the connection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is functionally the same bug as Go&amp;#39;s
[GO-2026-4340](https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4340) (CVE-2025-61730).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: rustls&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rustls accepted TLS 1.3 handshake messages sent at the wrong encryption level
when they followed a key-changing message in the same record. For example,
a plaintext `EncryptedExtensions` message packed into the same record as the
`ServerHello` was accepted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 8446 section 5.1 requires that handshake messages do not span key changes,
and that implementations terminate the connection with an &amp;#34;unexpected_message&amp;#34;
alert if they do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The handshake transcript is still authenticated, so a network-position attacker
cannot use this to alter or complete a handshake; the practical effect is that
a peer could send handshake messages that should be encrypted in plaintext
without rustls rejecting the connection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is functionally the same bug as Go&amp;#39;s
[GO-2026-4340](https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4340) (CVE-2025-61730).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rustsec-2026-0285</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-123613</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-123613</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: rust-rustls, Ubuntu:26.10: rust-rustls, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: rust-rustls&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rustls from 0.23.13 before 0.23.45 accepts TLS 1.3 handshake messages at the wrong encryption level when they follow a key-changing message in the same record, because Deframer::aligned does not enforce RFC 8446 record-boundary alignment. A peer or on-path attacker can pack a plaintext EncryptedExtensions with the ServerHello, which rustls accepts unencrypted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: rust-rustls, Ubuntu:26.10: rust-rustls, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: rust-rustls&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rustls from 0.23.13 before 0.23.45 accepts TLS 1.3 handshake messages at the wrong encryption level when they follow a key-changing message in the same record, because Deframer::aligned does not enforce RFC 8446 record-boundary alignment. A peer or on-path attacker can pack a plaintext EncryptedExtensions with the ServerHello, which rustls accepts unencrypted.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-123613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
