<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 22:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-119284</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-119284</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;joserfc is a Python library that provides an implementation of several JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) standards. Prior to 1.7.6, joserfc compact JWS deserialization calls bytes.split() before enforcing the existing aggregate segment-size limits. When attacker-controlled compact serialization bytes reach deserialize_compact(), the split creates copies of the header, payload, and signature segments before ExceededSizeError rejects them, causing an additional allocation approximately proportional to the supplied token. Requests that exhaust available process memory can therefore cause an availability failure even though signature verification fails. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.6.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;joserfc is a Python library that provides an implementation of several JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) standards. Prior to 1.7.6, joserfc compact JWS deserialization calls bytes.split() before enforcing the existing aggregate segment-size limits. When attacker-controlled compact serialization bytes reach deserialize_compact(), the split creates copies of the header, payload, and signature segments before ExceededSizeError rejects them, causing an additional allocation approximately proportional to the supplied token. Requests that exhaust available process memory can therefore cause an availability failure even though signature verification fails. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.6.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-119284</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-9pg5-8c7x-5hfx — joserfc: Compact JWS size guard allocates attacker-controlled segments before rejection</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-9pg5-8c7x-5hfx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: joserfc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;joserfc 1.7.4 defines compact-JWS header, payload, and signature limits, but
calls `value.split(b&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;)` before validating them. Python `bytes.split()` copies
the attacker-controlled segments, so the current guard allocates roughly one
complete payload before rejecting it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Reproduction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```bash
.venv-research/bin/python 06-practical-testing/preauth-memory-profile.py
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The input is resident before a fork-isolated verifier runs, and every signature
is invalid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;| Input | Peak RSS delta | Amplification | Result |
|---:|---:|---:|---|
| 1 MiB | 1.11 MiB | 1.11× | size rejected |
| 4 MiB | 4.04 MiB | 1.01× | size rejected |
| 8 MiB | 8.04 MiB | 1.01× | size rejected |
| 16 MiB | 16.04 MiB | 1.00× | size rejected |
| 32 MiB | 31.74 MiB | 0.99× | size rejected |
| 64 MiB | 63.80 MiB | 1.00× | size rejected |&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unconstrained profile is the primary evidence: joserfc allocates an
additional attacker-sized object before producing its intended
`ExceededSizeError`. A separate baseline-plus-headroom stress test raises
`MemoryError` when that copy cannot fit, but this report does not characterize
an absolute `RLIMIT_AS` value as a realistic worker memory budget.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Security Argument&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is not that joserfc can prevent the transport layer from receiving a
large header. The issue is narrower: once bytes reach `deserialize_compact()`,
the library&amp;#39;s existing size guard cannot fulfill its allocation-limiting purpose
because attacker-controlled segment copies are crea…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: joserfc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;joserfc 1.7.4 defines compact-JWS header, payload, and signature limits, but
calls `value.split(b&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;)` before validating them. Python `bytes.split()` copies
the attacker-controlled segments, so the current guard allocates roughly one
complete payload before rejecting it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Reproduction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```bash
.venv-research/bin/python 06-practical-testing/preauth-memory-profile.py
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The input is resident before a fork-isolated verifier runs, and every signature
is invalid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;| Input | Peak RSS delta | Amplification | Result |
|---:|---:|---:|---|
| 1 MiB | 1.11 MiB | 1.11× | size rejected |
| 4 MiB | 4.04 MiB | 1.01× | size rejected |
| 8 MiB | 8.04 MiB | 1.01× | size rejected |
| 16 MiB | 16.04 MiB | 1.00× | size rejected |
| 32 MiB | 31.74 MiB | 0.99× | size rejected |
| 64 MiB | 63.80 MiB | 1.00× | size rejected |&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unconstrained profile is the primary evidence: joserfc allocates an
additional attacker-sized object before producing its intended
`ExceededSizeError`. A separate baseline-plus-headroom stress test raises
`MemoryError` when that copy cannot fit, but this report does not characterize
an absolute `RLIMIT_AS` value as a realistic worker memory budget.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Security Argument&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is not that joserfc can prevent the transport layer from receiving a
large header. The issue is narrower: once bytes reach `deserialize_compact()`,
the library&amp;#39;s existing size guard cannot fulfill its allocation-limiting purpose
because attacker-controlled segment copies are crea…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-9pg5-8c7x-5hfx</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
