<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 18:33:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-106443</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-106443</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;WeasyPrint helps web developers to create PDF documents. Prior to 70.0, the image-loading path in weasyprint/images.py passes fetched image bytes from HTML img URLs, CSS image values, SVG image references, and data URIs to Pillow&amp;#39;s generic image dispatcher without excluding EPS or PostScript formats. On hosts with Ghostscript installed, Pillow EpsImagePlugin invokes the interpreter for attacker-controlled PostScript, which can produce interpreter-permitted effects and can lead to remote code execution when the installed Ghostscript version has a usable sandbox bypass. Hosts without Ghostscript do not reach this rasterization path. This issue is fixed in version 70.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;WeasyPrint helps web developers to create PDF documents. Prior to 70.0, the image-loading path in weasyprint/images.py passes fetched image bytes from HTML img URLs, CSS image values, SVG image references, and data URIs to Pillow&amp;#39;s generic image dispatcher without excluding EPS or PostScript formats. On hosts with Ghostscript installed, Pillow EpsImagePlugin invokes the interpreter for attacker-controlled PostScript, which can produce interpreter-permitted effects and can lead to remote code execution when the installed Ghostscript version has a usable sandbox bypass. Hosts without Ghostscript do not reach this rasterization path. This issue is fixed in version 70.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-106443</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-r543-q48m-4c9j — WeasyPrint: EPS images reach the Ghostscript interpreter resulting in RCE</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-r543-q48m-4c9j</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: WeasyPrint&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was found during a pentest, funded by the NLNnet foundation, conducted by Stefan Vink from Radically Open Security and the only High issue found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WeasyPrint passes fetched image bytes directly to Pillow&amp;#39;s generic format dispatcher without restricting the input format. When Ghostscript is installed on the host, Pillow&amp;#39;s EpsImagePlugin invokes it to rasterize attacker-controlled EPS/PS input. Any content that can supply an image to WeasyPrint (an &amp;lt;img&amp;gt; URL, CSS image value, SVG image reference, or data URI) can therefore drive untrusted PostScript into an external interpreter. On hosts running a Ghostscript version with a known -dSAFER bypass, this yields remote code execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The image pipeline reads an external response and hands the raw bytes to Pillow&amp;#39;s format-agnostic Image.open, with no allowlist of safe raster formats:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;with fetch(url_fetcher, url) as response:
    bytestring = response.read()
    mime_type = forced_mime_type or response.content_type&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pillow_image = Image.open(BytesIO(bytestring))&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pillow selects the handler from the byte signature. For EPS/PS input it selects PIL.EpsImagePlugin, which invokes Ghostscript to rasterize the input when a Ghostscript executable is available. Modern Ghostscript builds may run with -dSAFER, but that does not remove the interpreter boundary — it only constrains it, and multiple CVEs have bypassed it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The defect in WeasyPrint is that it dispatches untrusted bytes to a format handler capa…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: WeasyPrint&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was found during a pentest, funded by the NLNnet foundation, conducted by Stefan Vink from Radically Open Security and the only High issue found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WeasyPrint passes fetched image bytes directly to Pillow&amp;#39;s generic format dispatcher without restricting the input format. When Ghostscript is installed on the host, Pillow&amp;#39;s EpsImagePlugin invokes it to rasterize attacker-controlled EPS/PS input. Any content that can supply an image to WeasyPrint (an &amp;lt;img&amp;gt; URL, CSS image value, SVG image reference, or data URI) can therefore drive untrusted PostScript into an external interpreter. On hosts running a Ghostscript version with a known -dSAFER bypass, this yields remote code execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The image pipeline reads an external response and hands the raw bytes to Pillow&amp;#39;s format-agnostic Image.open, with no allowlist of safe raster formats:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;with fetch(url_fetcher, url) as response:
    bytestring = response.read()
    mime_type = forced_mime_type or response.content_type&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pillow_image = Image.open(BytesIO(bytestring))&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pillow selects the handler from the byte signature. For EPS/PS input it selects PIL.EpsImagePlugin, which invokes Ghostscript to rasterize the input when a Ghostscript executable is available. Modern Ghostscript builds may run with -dSAFER, but that does not remove the interpreter boundary — it only constrains it, and multiple CVEs have bypassed it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The defect in WeasyPrint is that it dispatches untrusted bytes to a format handler capa…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-r543-q48m-4c9j</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-106443</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-106443</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: weasyprint, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: weasyprint, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: weasyprint, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: weasyprint&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(WeasyPrint helps web developers to create PDF documents. Prior to 70.0 ...)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: weasyprint, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: weasyprint, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: weasyprint, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: weasyprint&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(WeasyPrint helps web developers to create PDF documents. Prior to 70.0 ...)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-106443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
