<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://db.gcve.eu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 07:44:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-12377</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/bdu:2026-12377</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-12377</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/bdu:2026-12377</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0252 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0252</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0252</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0252</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2022-49520</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49520</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64: compat: Do not treat syscall number as ESR_ELx for a bad syscall&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a compat process tries to execute an unknown system call above the
__ARM_NR_COMPAT_END number, the kernel sends a SIGILL signal to the
offending process. Information about the error is printed to dmesg in
compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt; arm64_notify_die() -&amp;gt; arm64_force_sig_fault() -&amp;gt;
arm64_show_signal().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64_show_signal() interprets a non-zero value for
current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code as an exception syndrome and displays the
message associated with the ESR_ELx.EC field (bits 31:26).
current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code is set in compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt;
arm64_notify_die() with the bad syscall number instead of a valid ESR_ELx
value. This means that the ESR_ELx.EC field has the value that the user set
for the syscall number and the kernel can end up printing bogus exception
messages*. For example, for the syscall number 0x68000000, which evaluates
to ESR_ELx.EC value of 0x1A (ESR_ELx_EC_FPAC) the kernel prints this error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[   18.349161] syscall[300]: unhandled exception: ERET/ERETAA/ERETAB, ESR 0x68000000, Oops - bad compat syscall(2) in syscall[10000+50000]
[   18.350639] CPU: 2 PID: 300 Comm: syscall Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1 #79
[   18.351249] Hardware name: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.0 (DT)
[..]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;which is misleading, as the bad compat syscall has nothing to do with
pointer authentication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stop arm64_show_signal() from printing exception syndrome informatio…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64: compat: Do not treat syscall number as ESR_ELx for a bad syscall&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a compat process tries to execute an unknown system call above the
__ARM_NR_COMPAT_END number, the kernel sends a SIGILL signal to the
offending process. Information about the error is printed to dmesg in
compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt; arm64_notify_die() -&amp;gt; arm64_force_sig_fault() -&amp;gt;
arm64_show_signal().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64_show_signal() interprets a non-zero value for
current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code as an exception syndrome and displays the
message associated with the ESR_ELx.EC field (bits 31:26).
current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code is set in compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt;
arm64_notify_die() with the bad syscall number instead of a valid ESR_ELx
value. This means that the ESR_ELx.EC field has the value that the user set
for the syscall number and the kernel can end up printing bogus exception
messages*. For example, for the syscall number 0x68000000, which evaluates
to ESR_ELx.EC value of 0x1A (ESR_ELx_EC_FPAC) the kernel prints this error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[   18.349161] syscall[300]: unhandled exception: ERET/ERETAA/ERETAB, ESR 0x68000000, Oops - bad compat syscall(2) in syscall[10000+50000]
[   18.350639] CPU: 2 PID: 300 Comm: syscall Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1 #79
[   18.351249] Hardware name: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.0 (DT)
[..]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;which is misleading, as the bad compat syscall has nothing to do with
pointer authentication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stop arm64_show_signal() from printing exception syndrome informatio…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49520</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-3767-6vx2-72qj</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-3767-6vx2-72qj</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64: compat: Do not treat syscall number as ESR_ELx for a bad syscall&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a compat process tries to execute an unknown system call above the
__ARM_NR_COMPAT_END number, the kernel sends a SIGILL signal to the
offending process. Information about the error is printed to dmesg in
compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt; arm64_notify_die() -&amp;gt; arm64_force_sig_fault() -&amp;gt;
arm64_show_signal().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64_show_signal() interprets a non-zero value for
current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code as an exception syndrome and displays the
message associated with the ESR_ELx.EC field (bits 31:26).
current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code is set in compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt;
arm64_notify_die() with the bad syscall number instead of a valid ESR_ELx
value. This means that the ESR_ELx.EC field has the value that the user set
for the syscall number and the kernel can end up printing bogus exception
messages*. For example, for the syscall number 0x68000000, which evaluates
to ESR_ELx.EC value of 0x1A (ESR_ELx_EC_FPAC) the kernel prints this error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[   18.349161] syscall[300]: unhandled exception: ERET/ERETAA/ERETAB, ESR 0x68000000, Oops - bad compat syscall(2) in syscall[10000+50000]
[   18.350639] CPU: 2 PID: 300 Comm: syscall Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1 #79
[   18.351249] Hardware name: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.0 (DT)
[..]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;which is misleading, as the bad compat syscall has nothing to do with
pointer authentication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stop arm64_show_signal() from printing exception syndrome informatio…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64: compat: Do not treat syscall number as ESR_ELx for a bad syscall&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a compat process tries to execute an unknown system call above the
__ARM_NR_COMPAT_END number, the kernel sends a SIGILL signal to the
offending process. Information about the error is printed to dmesg in
compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt; arm64_notify_die() -&amp;gt; arm64_force_sig_fault() -&amp;gt;
arm64_show_signal().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arm64_show_signal() interprets a non-zero value for
current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code as an exception syndrome and displays the
message associated with the ESR_ELx.EC field (bits 31:26).
current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code is set in compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt;
arm64_notify_die() with the bad syscall number instead of a valid ESR_ELx
value. This means that the ESR_ELx.EC field has the value that the user set
for the syscall number and the kernel can end up printing bogus exception
messages*. For example, for the syscall number 0x68000000, which evaluates
to ESR_ELx.EC value of 0x1A (ESR_ELx_EC_FPAC) the kernel prints this error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[   18.349161] syscall[300]: unhandled exception: ERET/ERETAA/ERETAB, ESR 0x68000000, Oops - bad compat syscall(2) in syscall[10000+50000]
[   18.350639] CPU: 2 PID: 300 Comm: syscall Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1 #79
[   18.351249] Hardware name: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.0 (DT)
[..]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;which is misleading, as the bad compat syscall has nothing to do with
pointer authentication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stop arm64_show_signal() from printing exception syndrome informatio…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-3767-6vx2-72qj</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-2885 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/oesa-2025-2885</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:scsi: pm8001: Fix tag leaks on errorIn pm8001_chip_set_dev_state_req(), pm8001_chip_fw_flash_update_req(),pm80xx_chip_phy_ctl_req() and pm8001_chip_reg_dev_req() add missing callsto pm8001_tag_free() to free the allocated tag when pm8001_mpi_build_cmd()fails.Similarly, in pm8001_exec_internal_task_abort(), if the chip -&amp;amp;gt;task_abortmethod fails, the tag allocated for the abort request task must befreed. Add the missing call to pm8001_tag_free().(CVE-2022-49121)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:scsi: qla2xxx: Fix scheduling while atomicThe driver makes a call into midlayer (fc_remote_port_delete) which can putthe thread to sleep. The thread that originates the call is in interruptcontext. The combination of the two trigger a crash. Schedule the call innon-interrupt context where it is more safe.kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/7/0/0x00010000kernel: Call Trace:kernel:  &amp;amp;lt;IRQ&amp;amp;gt;kernel:  dump_stack+0x66/0x81kernel:  __schedule_bug.cold.90+0x5/0x1dkernel:  __schedule+0x7af/0x960kernel:  schedule+0x28/0x80kernel:  schedule_timeout+0x26d/0x3b0kernel:  wait_for_completion+0xb4/0x140kernel:  ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70kernel:  __wait_rcu_gp+0x12c/0x160kernel:  ? sdev_evt_alloc+0xc0/0x180 [scsi_mod]kernel:  synchronize_sched+0x6c/0x80kernel:  ? call_rcu_bh+0x20/0x20kernel:  ? __bpf_trace_rcu_invoke_ca…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:scsi: pm8001: Fix tag leaks on errorIn pm8001_chip_set_dev_state_req(), pm8001_chip_fw_flash_update_req(),pm80xx_chip_phy_ctl_req() and pm8001_chip_reg_dev_req() add missing callsto pm8001_tag_free() to free the allocated tag when pm8001_mpi_build_cmd()fails.Similarly, in pm8001_exec_internal_task_abort(), if the chip -&amp;amp;gt;task_abortmethod fails, the tag allocated for the abort request task must befreed. Add the missing call to pm8001_tag_free().(CVE-2022-49121)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:scsi: qla2xxx: Fix scheduling while atomicThe driver makes a call into midlayer (fc_remote_port_delete) which can putthe thread to sleep. The thread that originates the call is in interruptcontext. The combination of the two trigger a crash. Schedule the call innon-interrupt context where it is more safe.kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/7/0/0x00010000kernel: Call Trace:kernel:  &amp;amp;lt;IRQ&amp;amp;gt;kernel:  dump_stack+0x66/0x81kernel:  __schedule_bug.cold.90+0x5/0x1dkernel:  __schedule+0x7af/0x960kernel:  schedule+0x28/0x80kernel:  schedule_timeout+0x26d/0x3b0kernel:  wait_for_completion+0xb4/0x140kernel:  ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70kernel:  __wait_rcu_gp+0x12c/0x160kernel:  ? sdev_evt_alloc+0xc0/0x180 [scsi_mod]kernel:  synchronize_sched+0x6c/0x80kernel:  ? call_rcu_bh+0x20/0x20kernel:  ? __bpf_trace_rcu_invoke_ca…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/oesa-2025-2885</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2023:2458 — security update for kernel</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rhsa-2023:2458</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;security update for kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;security update for kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rhsa-2023:2458</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:1027-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/suse-su-2025:1027-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/suse-su-2025:1027-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2022-49520</title>
      <link>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49520</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 144 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64: compat: Do not treat syscall number as ESR_ELx for a bad syscall If a compat process tries to execute an unknown system call above the __ARM_NR_COMPAT_END number, the kernel sends a SIGILL signal to the offending process. Information about the error is printed to dmesg in compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt; arm64_notify_die() -&amp;gt; arm64_force_sig_fault() -&amp;gt; arm64_show_signal(). arm64_show_signal() interprets a non-zero value for current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code as an exception syndrome and displays the message associated with the ESR_ELx.EC field (bits 31:26). current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code is set in compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt; arm64_notify_die() with the bad syscall number instead of a valid ESR_ELx value. This means that the ESR_ELx.EC field has the value that the user set for the syscall number and the kernel can end up printing bogus exception messages*. For example, for the syscall number 0x68000000, which evaluates to ESR_ELx.EC value of 0x1A (ESR_ELx_EC_FPAC) the kernel prints this error: [   18.349161] syscall[300]: unhandled exception: ERET/ERETAA/ERETAB, ESR 0x68000000, Oops - bad compat syscall(2) in syscall[10000+50000] [   18.350639] CPU: 2 PID: 300 Comm: syscall Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1 #79 [   18.351249] Hardware name: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.0 (DT) [..] which is misleading, as the bad compat syscall has nothing to do with pointer authentication. Stop arm64_show_signal() from printing exception syndrome information by h…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 144 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64: compat: Do not treat syscall number as ESR_ELx for a bad syscall If a compat process tries to execute an unknown system call above the __ARM_NR_COMPAT_END number, the kernel sends a SIGILL signal to the offending process. Information about the error is printed to dmesg in compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt; arm64_notify_die() -&amp;gt; arm64_force_sig_fault() -&amp;gt; arm64_show_signal(). arm64_show_signal() interprets a non-zero value for current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code as an exception syndrome and displays the message associated with the ESR_ELx.EC field (bits 31:26). current-&amp;gt;thread.fault_code is set in compat_arm_syscall() -&amp;gt; arm64_notify_die() with the bad syscall number instead of a valid ESR_ELx value. This means that the ESR_ELx.EC field has the value that the user set for the syscall number and the kernel can end up printing bogus exception messages*. For example, for the syscall number 0x68000000, which evaluates to ESR_ELx.EC value of 0x1A (ESR_ELx_EC_FPAC) the kernel prints this error: [   18.349161] syscall[300]: unhandled exception: ERET/ERETAA/ERETAB, ESR 0x68000000, Oops - bad compat syscall(2) in syscall[10000+50000] [   18.350639] CPU: 2 PID: 300 Comm: syscall Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1 #79 [   18.351249] Hardware name: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.0 (DT) [..] which is misleading, as the bad compat syscall has nothing to do with pointer authentication. Stop arm64_show_signal() from printing exception syndrome information by h…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
