<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T19:34:20.782227+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-66357</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-66357 — inets,httpd:HTTP Request Smuggling via obs-fold Header Continuation</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T19:34:20.816855+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Erlang OTP</p>
<p>httpd has never implemented obs-fold (RFC 2616 §2.2 / RFC 7230 §3.2.4 header continuation lines). Every CRLF followed by a non-CRLF octet unconditionally starts a new header. This missing feature became a security concern as the understanding of HTTP request smuggling attacks evolved.</p>
<p>This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-66357"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/usn-8827-1</id>
    <title>USN-8827-1 — erlang vulnerabilities</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T19:34:20.816986+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: erlang, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: erlang, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: erlang, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: erlang, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: erlang, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: erlang, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: erlang</p>
<p>It was discovered that the Erlang Port Mapper Daemon did not properly
handle slow connections. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue
to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-42792)</p>
<p>It was discovered that Erlang incorrectly handled certain external term
format data, leading to heap corruption. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to cause Erlang to crash, resulting in a denial of service.
This issue only affected Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.
(CVE-2026-55737)</p>
<p>It was discovered that Erlang incorrectly handled invalid external term
format data. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Erlang to
crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu
26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-54890)</p>
<p>It was discovered that Erlang incorrectly handled certain packet lengths,
leading to a buffer overflow. A remote attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause Erlang to crash or execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2026-75538)</p>
<p>It was discovered that the Erlang Megaco flex scanner incorrectly handled
certain input, leading to a buffer overflow. A remote attacker could
possibly use this issue to cause Erlang to crash or execute arbitrary code.
(CVE-2026-59250)</p>
<p>It was discovered that Erlang TLS clients incorrectly accepted cipher
suites that they had not offered. A remote attacker could possibly use
this issue to intercept and modify TLS communications. (CVE-2026-55953)</p>
<p>It was discovered that Erlang incorrectly handled certain certificate
chains. A remote att…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/usn-8827-1"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
