<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T14:37:13.931482+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2022-49214</id>
    <title>CVE-2022-49214 — powerpc/64s: Don't use DSISR for SLB faults</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T14:37:13.933225+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>powerpc/64s: Don't use DSISR for SLB faults</p>
<p>Since commit 46ddcb3950a2 ("powerpc/mm: Show if a bad page fault on data
is read or write.") we use page_fault_is_write(regs-&gt;dsisr) in
__bad_page_fault() to determine if the fault is for a read or write, and
change the message printed accordingly.</p>
<p>But SLB faults, aka Data Segment Interrupts, don't set DSISR (Data
Storage Interrupt Status Register) to a useful value. All ISA versions
from v2.03 through v3.1 specify that the Data Segment Interrupt sets
DSISR "to an undefined value". As far as I can see there's no mention of
SLB faults setting DSISR in any BookIV content either.</p>
<p>This manifests as accesses that should be a read being incorrectly
reported as writes, for example, using the xmon "dump" command:</p>
<p>0:mon&gt; d 0x5deadbeef0000000
  5deadbeef0000000
  [359526.415354][    C6] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0x5deadbeef0000000
  [359526.415611][    C6] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000010a300
  cpu 0x6: Vector: 380 (Data SLB Access) at [c00000000ffbf400]
      pc: c00000000010a300: mread+0x90/0x190</p>
<p>If we disassemble the PC, we see a load instruction:</p>
<p>0:mon&gt; di c00000000010a300
  c00000000010a300 89490000      lbz     r10,0(r9)</p>
<p>We can also see in exceptions-64s.S that the data_access_slb block
doesn't set IDSISR=1, which means it doesn't load DSISR into pt_regs. So
the value we're using to determine if the fault is a read/wri…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2022-49214"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
