<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-15T05:37:52.978080+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-74877</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-74877 — openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Missing Ownership Verification via revoke_key</title>
    <updated>2026-10-15T05:37:52.991868+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> jahlives openssl_encrypt</p>
<p>openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 contain a missing ownership verification vulnerability in the revoke_key method that allows authenticated clients to revoke any other client's key. Attackers can revoke arbitrary keys by providing a valid ML-DSA signature, bypassing the intended ownership restriction.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-74877"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-hvc7-763r-4f3h</id>
    <title>GHSA-hvc7-763r-4f3h — openssl-encrypt has no owner verification on key revocation — any client can revoke any key</title>
    <updated>2026-10-15T05:37:52.991978+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: openssl-encrypt</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>The `revoke_key` method in `openssl_encrypt_server/modules/keyserver/service.py` at **lines 195-270** accepts a `client_id` parameter but never verifies that the requesting client is the same as `key.owner_client_id`.</p>
<p>### Impact</p>
<p>Any authenticated client can revoke any other client's key, as long as they provide a valid revocation signature. While the signature requirement mitigates this somewhat (you need the private key to sign), the lack of ownership check is a defense-in-depth gap.</p>
<p>### Recommended Fix</p>
<p>- Add an ownership check: verify `client_id == key.owner_client_id` before allowing revocation
- Return 403 Forbidden if the requesting client does not own the key</p>
<p>### Fix</p>
<p>Fixed in commit `05e45f3` on branch `releases/1.4.x` — added documentation that ML-DSA signature verification IS the cryptographic ownership check; added info-level logging on successful verification.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-hvc7-763r-4f3h"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
