<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-24T20:10:15.912250+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98996</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-98996 — fs: don't silently unmount busy mounts</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T20:10:15.913430+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fs: don't silently unmount busy mounts</p>
<p>The propagate_mount_busy() helper exists to decide whether a synchronous
can suceed. It does that by looking at the copies of the victims in the
mounts its parent propagates to. One of those functions from propagation
hell.</p>
<p>It skips a copy that has child mounts except for the case of a single
child mount covering the copy's root. That algorithm used to be exact.
It isn't anymore.</p>
<p>Originally only childless copies were unmounted during propagation.
And 1064f874abc0 ("mnt: Tuck mounts under others instead of creating
shadow/side mounts.") ended up adding covered mounts to both sides in
one go.</p>
<p>Along came 99b19d16471e ("mnt: In propgate_umount handle visiting mounts
in any order") and that started to unmount more than before:</p>
<p>[1]: A copy of a mount is unmounted when each of its children is either
     its overmount or a copy of the victim itself. In the former case
     the overmount gets reparented. In the latter case the copy of the
     victim will end up being unmounted.</p>
<p>So propagate_umount() ended up being rewritten without adjusting
propagate_mount_busy(). And currently propagate_mount_busy() doesn't
look at copies of the victim that have two or more children nor a single
child that is not the overmount.</p>
<p>So any such copy in [1] is not checked for
references. The result is that a synchronous unmount succeeds, pulling
out a mount that is still in use.</p>
<p>A contain…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98996"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
