<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-24T17:11:47.103540+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98923</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-98923 — arm64: io: Reject non-user protection in ioremap_prot()</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T17:11:47.104784+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>arm64: io: Reject non-user protection in ioremap_prot()</p>
<p>Mapping a stack-top page via /dev/mem with PROT_NONE and then
reading that process's /proc/&lt;pid&gt;/cmdline triggers a spurious WARN
in ioremap_prot() through generic_access_phys():</p>
<p>WARNING: ./arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:275 at generic_access_phys
  Call trace:
    generic_access_phys+0x1c8/0x228 (P)
    __access_remote_vm+0x2b4/0x398
    access_remote_vm+0x14/0x30
    get_mm_cmdline+0xf8/0x2a0
    proc_pid_cmdline_read+0x68/0x120</p>
<p>generic_access_phys() passes the protection derived from the user PTE
to ioremap_prot(). On arm64, a PROT_NONE mapping is represented by a
present-invalid PTE, so pte_present() still returns true and the
protection reaches ioremap_prot().</p>
<p>A PROT_NONE mapping does not have PTE_USER, causing the existing
WARN_ON_ONCE() in ioremap_prot() to fire even though this is a valid
user mapping. Execute-only mappings have the same issue and must not
be readable through this path either.</p>
<p>ioremap_prot() should therefore reject protection values without
PTE_USER without warning. This makes the access fail cleanly for
PROT_NONE and execute-only mappings while retaining the existing
user-protection contract.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98923"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
