<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-11-03T09:23:50.342490+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98826</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-98826 — rtc: ac100: Fix clock provider use-after-free on probe failure</title>
    <updated>2026-11-03T09:23:50.343590+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>rtc: ac100: Fix clock provider use-after-free on probe failure</p>
<p>ac100_rtc_register_clks() registers the RTC-32k clock with
clk_hw_register_fixed_rate() and the clock provider with
of_clk_add_hw_provider(). Neither is device managed, and both are
released only from ac100_rtc_remove(). The driver core does not call
remove() when probe() fails: really_probe() reaches probe_failed below
the device_remove() call and goes straight to releasing the device's
managed resources.</p>
<p>ac100_rtc_probe() ends with</p>
<p>return devm_rtc_register_device(chip-&gt;rtc);</p>
<p>so if that fails after the clocks have been registered, the provider is
left on the global of_clk_providers list holding chip-&gt;clk_data, which
was allocated with devm_kzalloc() and is freed while probe() unwinds. A
later lookup on this device tree node then reads freed memory in
of_clk_hw_onecell_get(). Consumers that do exactly that exist in tree:
the wifi power sequence nodes on sun8i-a83t-bananapi-m3 and
sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus take &lt;&amp;ac100_rtc 1&gt;, and the sun9i-a80 boards
route osc32k through &lt;&amp;ac100_rtc 0&gt;. The window is narrow, as
devm_rtc_register_device() can only fail with -ENOMEM here, but the
provider is left dangling whenever it does.</p>
<p>The RTC-32k clock is leaked on the same path. Since clk_core_lookup()
searches a global list that is not scoped per device, __clk_register()
rejects the duplicate name with -EEXIST, so the leak also makes a later
probe of…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98826"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
