<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-22T21:38:46.827313+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98427</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-98427 — net/sched: codel: bound the dropping loop per dequeue call</title>
    <updated>2026-10-22T21:38:46.829950+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net/sched: codel: bound the dropping loop per dequeue call</p>
<p>The CoDel control law schedules the next drop one interval/sqrt(count)
after the previous drop, using the configured interval
(codel_params.interval). For very small intervals the scheduled step
rounds down to zero, so the dropping loop in codel_dequeue() never
advances and drains the entire backlog under the qdisc lock in one
call - an unprivileged user can trigger a soft lockup this way.</p>
<p>Fix in the shared codel code used by both codel and fq_codel:</p>
<p>1. Make the control-law step at least 1 tick so the dropping loop
   always moves forward.</p>
<p>2. Cap the dropping loop at CODEL_MAX_DROPS_PER_DEQUEUE (256) drops
   per codel_dequeue() call, resyncing drop_next to now when the cap
   is hit: the catch-up owed to the loop grows with the idle gap and
   the backlog, which no interval threshold can bound. This is a
   deliberate behaviour change after long idle gaps.</p>
<p>The cap applies to fq_codel (4b549a2ef4be) and the mac80211 TXQ path
(fixed interval, cap only).</p>
<p>The target sojourn delay (codel_params.target) is not validated: it
does not feed the control law, so a sub-tick value is aggressive
rather than deadlock-prone.</p>
<p>Conditions to recreate the bug:
  - tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: tbf rate 1kbit burst 2kb limit 1000000
  - tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:1 handle 10: codel interval 2us target 1ms noecn limit 1000000 (same for fq_codel)
  - unpatc…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-98427"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
