<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-24T22:13:52.666166+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98995</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-98995</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T22:13:52.667998+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>namespace: reset the old parent's -&gt;overmount in mnt_change_mountpoint()</p>
<p>__umount_mnt() resets -&gt;overmount of the parent when it unmounts the
mount that overmounts it. mnt_change_mountpoint() doesn't. It moves the
mount to its new parent and leaves the old one pointing at it.</p>
<p>For a mount that is moved beneath in attach_recursive_mnt() that doesn't
matter. The new mount has already reset -&gt;overmount of the old parent by
the time the old top mount is moved onto it.</p>
<p>It matters for reparent() though. propagate_umount() moves a surviving
overmount onto the first ancestor that isn't going to be unmounted. The
mount it was taken from is unmounted immediately afterwards. If a file
descriptor keeps that unmounted mount alive -&gt;overmount points at the
moved mount. That's a dangling pointer and UAF as the moved mount is
unmounted and freed.</p>
<p>do_lock_mount() follows -&gt;overmount from the target path under
mount_lock. With a file descriptor on such a mount as the target of a
mount beneath topmost_overmount() walks into the freed mount and
do_lock_mount() takes references on whatever it finds there.</p>
<p>So reset -&gt;overmount of the old parent in mnt_change_mountpoint() the
same way __umount_mnt() does. A mount's -&gt;overmount is then always a
mount that is attached to it.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98995"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-h4q9-qcg7-rj48</id>
    <title>GHSA-h4q9-qcg7-rj48</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T22:13:52.668068+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>namespace: reset the old parent's -&gt;overmount in mnt_change_mountpoint()</p>
<p>__umount_mnt() resets -&gt;overmount of the parent when it unmounts the
mount that overmounts it. mnt_change_mountpoint() doesn't. It moves the
mount to its new parent and leaves the old one pointing at it.</p>
<p>For a mount that is moved beneath in attach_recursive_mnt() that doesn't
matter. The new mount has already reset -&gt;overmount of the old parent by
the time the old top mount is moved onto it.</p>
<p>It matters for reparent() though. propagate_umount() moves a surviving
overmount onto the first ancestor that isn't going to be unmounted. The
mount it was taken from is unmounted immediately afterwards. If a file
descriptor keeps that unmounted mount alive -&gt;overmount points at the
moved mount. That's a dangling pointer and UAF as the moved mount is
unmounted and freed.</p>
<p>do_lock_mount() follows -&gt;overmount from the target path under
mount_lock. With a file descriptor on such a mount as the target of a
mount beneath topmost_overmount() walks into the freed mount and
do_lock_mount() takes references on whatever it finds there.</p>
<p>So reset -&gt;overmount of the old parent in mnt_change_mountpoint() the
same way __umount_mnt() does. A mount's -&gt;overmount is then always a
mount that is attached to it.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-h4q9-qcg7-rj48"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
