<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-09T23:17:33.705415+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-62179</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-62179</title>
    <updated>2026-10-09T23:17:33.734096+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In `praisonai-platform` prior to version 0.1.9, issue dependency deletion can be authorized against the wrong side of a dependency edge. A workspace member cannot delete a dependency through the owner-created issue endpoint, but can delete the same dependency through a member-owned related issue endpoint because the route accepts either endpoint and checks delete permission only against the caller-selected URL issue. Version 0.1.9 patches the issue.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-62179"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-mxmx-rh57-jx58</id>
    <title>GHSA-mxmx-rh57-jx58 — PraisonAI: Platform members can delete owner issue dependencies through member-owned related issues</title>
    <updated>2026-10-09T23:17:33.734212+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: praisonai-platform</p>
<p># Platform members can delete owner issue dependencies through member-owned related issues</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>`praisonai-platform` issue dependency deletion can be authorized against the wrong side of a dependency edge. A workspace member cannot delete a dependency through the owner-created issue endpoint, but can delete the same dependency through a member-owned related issue endpoint because the route accepts either endpoint and checks delete permission only against the caller-selected URL issue.</p>
<p>## Technical Details</p>
<p>The affected boundary is the difference between ordinary workspace membership and owner/admin authority over destructive changes to owner-created issue workflow state. `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/dependencies.py` defines `DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}/dependencies/{dep_id}`. The route first verifies that the URL `issue_id` is in the workspace, loads the dependency by `dep_id`, and accepts the dependency when either `dep.issue_id == issue_id` or `dep.depends_on_issue_id == issue_id`. It then calls `require_delete_permission(workspace_id, user, session, resource_owner_id=issue.creator_id)` for the URL issue only.</p>
<p>`src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/deps.py` implements `require_delete_permission` as "admin/owner or resource owner". That helper is appropriate when the protected resource has a single owner, but the dependency route lets the caller choose either side of the relationship before the helper runs.…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-mxmx-rh57-jx58"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
