<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-15T08:22:58.978952+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53999</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-53999</title>
    <updated>2026-10-15T08:22:59.001564+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Radius is a cloud-native, portable application platform that makes app development easier for teams building cloud-native apps. Prior to 0.58.0, the Kubernetes controller deserializes the user-controlled radapp.io/status annotation on a Deployment and uses its container resource identifier for deletion without confirming ownership by that Deployment. An attacker with permission to modify Deployment annotations and knowledge of a target Radius resource ID can forge radapp.io/status and set radapp.io/enabled to false, causing reconciliation to enter the privileged deletion path for another tenant's Radius-managed container resource. In a multi-tenant installation this confused-deputy condition can delete another team's recoverable container resource and disrupt service; in a single-tenant installation the impact is limited to self denial of service. The multi-tenant Radius controller reads the annotations in pkg/controller/reconciler/annotations.go and reaches the privileged delete in pkg/controller/reconciler/deployment_reconciler.go. The issue does not disclose data, grant privileges, or provide persistence. This issue is fixed in version 0.58.0.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53999"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-fp5j-4fj2-4jvq</id>
    <title>GHSA-fp5j-4fj2-4jvq — Radius Controller May Delete a Container Resource via an Injected Deployment Annotation (Multi-Tenant Installs)</title>
    <updated>2026-10-15T08:22:59.001688+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go: github.com/radius-project/radius</p>
<p># Radius Controller May Delete a Container Resource via an Injected Deployment Annotation (Multi-Tenant Installs)</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>A configuration-validation issue in the Radius Kubernetes controller can cause it to issue a `DELETE` for the container resource referenced by a tampered `radapp.io/status` annotation on a Deployment. It follows the "Confused Deputy" pattern. Real-world impact is bounded and depends heavily on install topology: in a multi-tenant install (one controller reconciling Deployments across resource groups owned by different teams) it can affect another team's container, while in a single-tenant install it is only self-DoS. There is no data disclosure, no privilege escalation, and no persistence, and deleted resources are recoverable through standard Radius deployment workflows.</p>
<p>- **Vulnerability Type**: Configuration Injection / Cross-Tenant Resource Deletion
- **CVSS 3.1 Score**: 7.7 (High in worst-case multi-tenant installs; Medium or lower in single-tenant or strict-RBAC installs)
- **CWE Classification**: CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation), CWE-441 (Unintended Proxy or Intermediary)
- **Affected Versions**: Radius v0.57.1 and earlier versions</p>
<p>## Vulnerability Details</p>
<p>### Root Cause</p>
<p>The Radius controller deserializes user-controllable JSON data from the `radapp.io/status` annotation on Kubernetes Deployments without validating whether the resource IDs belong to the current tenant. When the controller performs delete operations, it uses its own high-p…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-fp5j-4fj2-4jvq"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
