<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T05:41:40.968080+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-49836</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-49836</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T05:41:41.023647+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>psd-tools is a Python package for working with Adobe Photoshop PSD files. Prior to version 1.17.1, `SmartObject.save()` writes an embedded smart object to a path taken verbatim from the PSD file. Because that name is attacker-controlled and unsanitised, a tool that extracts embedded objects from an untrusted `.psd` can be made to write attacker-chosen bytes to an attacker-chosen path (absolute or `../`-traversing), outside its intended output directory. A secondary issue in `SmartObject.open()` for external-kind smart objects allows the attacker-controlled `fullPath` descriptor to be used as an arbitrary file read path, enabling exfiltration of the read content to the controlled write destination. Both issues are fixed in v1.17.1.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-49836"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-2rmg-vrx8-9j2f</id>
    <title>GHSA-2rmg-vrx8-9j2f — psd-tools vulnerable to arbitrary file write via smart-object filename</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T05:41:41.023780+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: psd-tools</p>
<p># psd-tools: arbitrary file write/read via smart-object path traversal</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>In `psd-tools` (all releases exposing the `SmartObject` API through **v1.17.0**), `SmartObject.save()` writes an embedded smart object to a path taken verbatim from the PSD file. Because that name is attacker-controlled and unsanitised, a tool that extracts embedded objects from an untrusted `.psd` can be made to write attacker-chosen bytes to an attacker-chosen path (absolute or `../`-traversing), outside its intended output directory.</p>
<p>A secondary issue in `SmartObject.open()` for external-kind smart objects allows the attacker-controlled `fullPath` descriptor to be used as an arbitrary file **read** path, enabling exfiltration of the read content to the controlled write destination. Both issues are fixed in **v1.17.1**.</p>
<p>## Details</p>
<p>### Write path — `SmartObject.save()` (primary)</p>
<p>`src/psd_tools/api/smart_object.py:170-179` (tag `v1.17.0`):</p>
<p>```python
def save(self, filename: str | None = None) -&gt; None:
    if filename is None:
        filename = self.filename          # untrusted, straight from the file
    with open(filename, "wb") as f:
        f.write(self.data)                # attacker-controlled bytes
```</p>
<p>`self.filename` comes from the file with no validation — the `filename` property (`:62-67`) returns `self._data.filename`, set by the linked-layer parser at `src/psd_tools/psd/linked_layer.py:100` (`read_unicode_string(fp)`). There is no `basename`, no absolute path rejection, and…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-2rmg-vrx8-9j2f"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/pysec-2026-2969</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-2969 — psd-tools vulnerable to arbitrary file write via smart-object filename</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T05:41:41.023924+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: psd-tools</p>
<p># psd-tools: arbitrary file write/read via smart-object path traversal</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>In `psd-tools` (all releases exposing the `SmartObject` API through **v1.17.0**), `SmartObject.save()` writes an embedded smart object to a path taken verbatim from the PSD file. Because that name is attacker-controlled and unsanitised, a tool that extracts embedded objects from an untrusted `.psd` can be made to write attacker-chosen bytes to an attacker-chosen path (absolute or `../`-traversing), outside its intended output directory.</p>
<p>A secondary issue in `SmartObject.open()` for external-kind smart objects allows the attacker-controlled `fullPath` descriptor to be used as an arbitrary file **read** path, enabling exfiltration of the read content to the controlled write destination. Both issues are fixed in **v1.17.1**.</p>
<p>## Details</p>
<p>### Write path — `SmartObject.save()` (primary)</p>
<p>`src/psd_tools/api/smart_object.py:170-179` (tag `v1.17.0`):</p>
<p>```python
def save(self, filename: str | None = None) -&gt; None:
    if filename is None:
        filename = self.filename          # untrusted, straight from the file
    with open(filename, "wb") as f:
        f.write(self.data)                # attacker-controlled bytes
```</p>
<p>`self.filename` comes from the file with no validation — the `filename` property (`:62-67`) returns `self._data.filename`, set by the linked-layer parser at `src/psd_tools/psd/linked_layer.py:100` (`read_unicode_string(fp)`). There is no `basename`, no absolute path rejection, and…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/pysec-2026-2969"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-49836</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-49836</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T05:41:41.024028+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: psd-tools, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: psd-tools</p>
<p>psd-tools is a Python package for working with Adobe Photoshop PSD files. Prior to version 1.17.1, `SmartObject.save()` writes an embedded smart object to a path taken verbatim from the PSD file. Because that name is attacker-controlled and unsanitised, a tool that extracts embedded objects from an untrusted `.psd` can be made to write attacker-chosen bytes to an attacker-chosen path (absolute or `../`-traversing), outside its intended output directory. A secondary issue in `SmartObject.open()` for external-kind smart objects allows the attacker-controlled `fullPath` descriptor to be used as an arbitrary file read path, enabling exfiltration of the read content to the controlled write destination. Both issues are fixed in v1.17.1.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-49836"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
