<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T08:20:09.166517+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/bdu:2026-04324</id>
    <title>bdu:2026-04324</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T08:20:10.093683+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2026-04324</content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/bdu:2026-04324"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0252</id>
    <title>certfr-2025-avi-0252 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T08:20:10.094089+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2025-avi-0252</content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0252"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49214</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2022-49214</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T08:20:10.094133+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>powerpc/64s: Don't use DSISR for SLB faults</p>
<p>Since commit 46ddcb3950a2 ("powerpc/mm: Show if a bad page fault on data
is read or write.") we use page_fault_is_write(regs-&gt;dsisr) in
__bad_page_fault() to determine if the fault is for a read or write, and
change the message printed accordingly.</p>
<p>But SLB faults, aka Data Segment Interrupts, don't set DSISR (Data
Storage Interrupt Status Register) to a useful value. All ISA versions
from v2.03 through v3.1 specify that the Data Segment Interrupt sets
DSISR "to an undefined value". As far as I can see there's no mention of
SLB faults setting DSISR in any BookIV content either.</p>
<p>This manifests as accesses that should be a read being incorrectly
reported as writes, for example, using the xmon "dump" command:</p>
<p>0:mon&gt; d 0x5deadbeef0000000
  5deadbeef0000000
  [359526.415354][    C6] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0x5deadbeef0000000
  [359526.415611][    C6] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000010a300
  cpu 0x6: Vector: 380 (Data SLB Access) at [c00000000ffbf400]
      pc: c00000000010a300: mread+0x90/0x190</p>
<p>If we disassemble the PC, we see a load instruction:</p>
<p>0:mon&gt; di c00000000010a300
  c00000000010a300 89490000      lbz     r10,0(r9)</p>
<p>We can also see in exceptions-64s.S that the data_access_slb block
doesn't set IDSISR=1, which means it doesn't load DSISR into pt_regs. So
the value we're using to determine if the fault is a read/wri…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49214"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-8jrg-738q-v5mw</id>
    <title>GHSA-8jrg-738q-v5mw</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T08:20:10.094350+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>powerpc/64s: Don't use DSISR for SLB faults</p>
<p>Since commit 46ddcb3950a2 ("powerpc/mm: Show if a bad page fault on data
is read or write.") we use page_fault_is_write(regs-&gt;dsisr) in
__bad_page_fault() to determine if the fault is for a read or write, and
change the message printed accordingly.</p>
<p>But SLB faults, aka Data Segment Interrupts, don't set DSISR (Data
Storage Interrupt Status Register) to a useful value. All ISA versions
from v2.03 through v3.1 specify that the Data Segment Interrupt sets
DSISR "to an undefined value". As far as I can see there's no mention of
SLB faults setting DSISR in any BookIV content either.</p>
<p>This manifests as accesses that should be a read being incorrectly
reported as writes, for example, using the xmon "dump" command:</p>
<p>0:mon&gt; d 0x5deadbeef0000000
  5deadbeef0000000
  [359526.415354][    C6] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0x5deadbeef0000000
  [359526.415611][    C6] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000010a300
  cpu 0x6: Vector: 380 (Data SLB Access) at [c00000000ffbf400]
      pc: c00000000010a300: mread+0x90/0x190</p>
<p>If we disassemble the PC, we see a load instruction:</p>
<p>0:mon&gt; di c00000000010a300
  c00000000010a300 89490000      lbz     r10,0(r9)</p>
<p>We can also see in exceptions-64s.S that the data_access_slb block
doesn't set IDSISR=1, which means it doesn't load DSISR into pt_regs. So
the value we're using to determine if the fault is a read/wri…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-8jrg-738q-v5mw"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rhsa-2023:2458</id>
    <title>RHSA-2023:2458 — security update for kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T08:20:10.094417+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>security update for kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/rhsa-2023:2458"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/suse-su-2025:1027-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2025:1027-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T08:20:10.095032+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/suse-su-2025:1027-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49214</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2022-49214</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T08:20:10.095689+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 85 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/64s: Don't use DSISR for SLB faults Since commit 46ddcb3950a2 ("powerpc/mm: Show if a bad page fault on data is read or write.") we use page_fault_is_write(regs-&gt;dsisr) in __bad_page_fault() to determine if the fault is for a read or write, and change the message printed accordingly. But SLB faults, aka Data Segment Interrupts, don't set DSISR (Data Storage Interrupt Status Register) to a useful value. All ISA versions from v2.03 through v3.1 specify that the Data Segment Interrupt sets DSISR "to an undefined value". As far as I can see there's no mention of SLB faults setting DSISR in any BookIV content either. This manifests as accesses that should be a read being incorrectly reported as writes, for example, using the xmon "dump" command:   0:mon&gt; d 0x5deadbeef0000000   5deadbeef0000000   [359526.415354][    C6] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0x5deadbeef0000000   [359526.415611][    C6] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000010a300   cpu 0x6: Vector: 380 (Data SLB Access) at [c00000000ffbf400]       pc: c00000000010a300: mread+0x90/0x190 If we disassemble the PC, we see a load instruction:   0:mon&gt; di c00000000010a300   c00000000010a300 89490000      lbz     r10,0(r9) We can also see in exceptions-64s.S that the data_access_slb block doesn't set IDSISR=1, which means it doesn't load DSISR into pt_regs. So the value we're using to determine if the fault is a read/write is so…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49214"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2107</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2107 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T08:20:10.095970+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2107"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
