<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-01T01:41:54.999968+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-46519</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-46519 — mcp-server-kubernetes Affected By Tool Access Control Bypass: Presentation-Layer Filtering Without Execution-Layer Enfo…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T01:41:55.002113+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Flux159 mcp-server-kubernetes</p>
<p>mcp-server-kubernetes is a Model Context Protocol server for Kubernetes cluster management. Prior to version 3.6.0, mcp-server-kubernetes exposes three environment variables (ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS, ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS, ALLOWED_TOOLS) documented as access controls for restricting which Kubernetes operations are available. These controls are enforced at the tool discovery layer (tools/list) but not at the execution layer (tools/call). Any client that knows a tool name can invoke it directly regardless of the configured restriction mode. The access control was effectively cosmetic. This issue has been patched in version 3.6.0.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-46519"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-cr22-wjx7-2w6m</id>
    <title>GHSA-cr22-wjx7-2w6m — MCP Server Kubernetes: Tool Access Control Bypass via Presentation-Layer Filtering Without Execution-Layer Enforcement</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T01:41:55.002237+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: mcp-server-kubernetes</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>`mcp-server-kubernetes` exposes three environment variables (`ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS`, `ALLOWED_TOOLS`) documented as access controls for restricting which Kubernetes operations are available. These controls are enforced at the tool discovery layer (`tools/list`) but not at the execution layer (`tools/call`). Any client that knows a tool name can invoke it directly regardless of the configured restriction mode. The access control was effectively cosmetic.</p>
<p>Fixed in v3.6.0.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>An attacker or misconfigured AI agent with network access to the MCP server's HTTP endpoint could invoke any Kubernetes tool regardless of the restriction mode configured by the operator -- including `kubectl_delete`, `exec_in_pod`, `kubectl_generic`, and `node_management`.</p>
<p>The project explicitly supports and documents multi-client HTTP deployment scenarios (Streamable HTTP and SSE transports, in-cluster deployments, Codex CLI and Gemini CLI integrations). In these deployments, operators relied on the tool restriction env vars to enforce least-privilege access across users or roles. The bypass invalidated that model entirely.</p>
<p>Severity scales with the Kubernetes service account's permissions. In environments where the MCP server runs with `cluster-admin` (common in dev/staging), this is equivalent to full cluster compromise for any client that can reach the endpoint.</p>
<p>The `MCP_AUTH_TOKEN` / `X-MCP-AUTH` mechanism controls who can reach the end…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-cr22-wjx7-2w6m"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
