<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-11-07T15:03:31.608025+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-118669</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-118669 — OAuthLib: Token grants can use attacker-supplied client_id for authorization after authenticating a different client</title>
    <updated>2026-11-07T15:03:31.612008+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> oauthlib</p>
<p>OAuthLib is an implementation of the OAuth request-signing logic for Python 3.6+. Prior to 4.0.0, the client_credentials and Resource Owner Password Credentials token grant handlers can authenticate request.client as one confidential client while retaining an attacker-supplied request.client_id for validate_grant_type and validate_scopes. A lower-privilege authenticated client can therefore cause grant and scope authorization to use another client's identity when an application validator relies on the documented client_id argument, potentially issuing tokens with unauthorized grants or scopes. Validators that authorize exclusively from request.client may not be affected. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-118669"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-7984-qgvg-3j9c</id>
    <title>GHSA-7984-qgvg-3j9c — OAuthLib: Token grants can use attacker-supplied client_id for authorization after authenticating a different client</title>
    <updated>2026-11-07T15:03:31.612106+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: oauthlib</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>OAuthlib's token grant handlers can authenticate one client while authorizing the grant type and requested scopes using a different, attacker-supplied `client_id` from the request body.</p>
<p>In affected token grant flows, `authenticate_client(request)` sets `request.client` to the authenticated client object, but OAuthlib does not require `request.client_id` to match `request.client.client_id`. If the request body already contains `client_id=...`, OAuthlib keeps that value and passes it to `validate_grant_type()` and `validate_scopes()`.</p>
<p>As a result, an authenticated low-privilege confidential client can authenticate as itself, submit another client's `client_id` in the token request body, and cause grant and scope validation to run under that other client identity.</p>
<p>## Affected Surface</p>
<p>The affected public surface is the OAuth2 token endpoint handling for:</p>
<p>- `client_credentials`
- `password` / Resource Owner Password Credentials</p>
<p>The issue is relevant to OAuthlib provider deployments where:</p>
<p>- the attacker has credentials for one valid lower-privilege confidential client;
- another client has broader grants or scopes;
- the application validator uses the `client_id` argument passed by OAuthlib in `validate_grant_type()` or `validate_scopes()`, as the `RequestValidator` API is designed to support.</p>
<p>Deployments whose validators ignore the `client_id` argument and authorize only from `request.client` may not be affected.</p>
<p>## Details</p>
<p>`Request` parses query and body p…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-7984-qgvg-3j9c"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
