<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T09:39:05.112679+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-30974</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-30974 — Copyparty volflag `nohtml` did not block javascript in svg files</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T09:39:05.114442+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> 9001 copyparty</p>
<p>Copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to v1.20.11., the nohtml config option, intended to prevent execution of JavaScript in user-uploaded HTML files, did not apply to SVG images. A user with write-permission could upload an SVG containing embedded JavaScript, which would execute in the context of whichever user opens it. This has been fixed in v1.20.11.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cve-2026-30974"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-m6hv-x64c-27mm</id>
    <title>GHSA-m6hv-x64c-27mm — copyparty: volflag `nohtml` did not block javascript in svg files</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T09:39:05.114514+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: copyparty</p>
<p>### Summary
The `nohtml` config option, intended to prevent execution of JavaScript in user-uploaded HTML files, did not apply to SVG images.</p>
<p>### Details
A user with write-permission could upload an SVG containing embedded JavaScript, which would execute in the context of whichever user opens it.</p>
<p>This in itself is not a vulnerability; it is intended behavior according to [the SVG spec](https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/script.html). The vulnerability is that the `nohtml` volflag, when enabled, did not prevent this.</p>
<p>`nohtml`, intended for use on volumes which contains untrusted files, would correctly prevent execution of javascript in HTML files, but did not consider SVG images. This has been fixed in v1.20.11.</p>
<p>### Impact
The malicious JavaScript could move or delete existing files on the server, or upload new files, using the account of the person who opens the SVG.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-m6hv-x64c-27mm"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/pysec-2026-2137</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-2137</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T09:39:05.114552+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: copyparty</p>
<p>Copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to v1.20.11., the nohtml config option, intended to prevent execution of JavaScript in user-uploaded HTML files, did not apply to SVG images. A user with write-permission could upload an SVG containing embedded JavaScript, which would execute in the context of whichever user opens it. This has been fixed in v1.20.11.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/pysec-2026-2137"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
