<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-24T20:29:19.445564+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99009</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-99009</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T20:29:19.463911+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>Bluetooth: RFCOMM: connect the session socket without rfcomm_mutex</p>
<p>An RFCOMM connect() issued while a BR/EDR link is being authenticated
makes lockdep report a circular dependency, and the reported cycle is a
real AB/BA between rfcomm_mutex and hdev-&gt;lock.</p>
<p>rfcomm_security_cfm() is called from the HCI event path, which already
holds hdev-&gt;lock:</p>
<p>hci_rx_work()
    hci_event_packet()
      hci_cc_read_enc_key_size()   [hdev-&gt;lock]
        hci_encrypt_cfm()          [hci_cb_list_lock]
          rfcomm_security_cfm()    [rfcomm_mutex]</p>
<p>while an RFCOMM connect() from userspace takes the same two locks the
other way round:</p>
<p>rfcomm_sock_connect()
    rfcomm_dlc_open()              [rfcomm_mutex]
      __rfcomm_dlc_open()
        rfcomm_session_create()
          kernel_connect()
            l2cap_sock_connect()
              l2cap_chan_connect() [hdev-&gt;lock]</p>
<p>WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  kworker/u131:1/1128 is trying to acquire lock:
  rfcomm_mutex, at: rfcomm_security_cfm+0x31/0x3e0 [rfcomm]
  but task is already holding lock:
  hci_cb_list_lock, at: hci_cc_read_enc_key_size+0x1d2/0xcc0
  Chain exists of:
    rfcomm_mutex --&gt; &amp;hdev-&gt;lock --&gt; hci_cb_list_lock</p>
<p>hci_auth_complete_evt() and hci_encrypt_change_evt() reach the callback
the same way.</p>
<p>Both orders have to be seen in the same boot, which is why a BR/EDR
connection alone is not enough to show it: a session set up by the
r…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-99009"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-5rpp-jh2w-vm6p</id>
    <title>GHSA-5rpp-jh2w-vm6p</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T20:29:19.464117+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>Bluetooth: RFCOMM: connect the session socket without rfcomm_mutex</p>
<p>An RFCOMM connect() issued while a BR/EDR link is being authenticated
makes lockdep report a circular dependency, and the reported cycle is a
real AB/BA between rfcomm_mutex and hdev-&gt;lock.</p>
<p>rfcomm_security_cfm() is called from the HCI event path, which already
holds hdev-&gt;lock:</p>
<p>hci_rx_work()
    hci_event_packet()
      hci_cc_read_enc_key_size()   [hdev-&gt;lock]
        hci_encrypt_cfm()          [hci_cb_list_lock]
          rfcomm_security_cfm()    [rfcomm_mutex]</p>
<p>while an RFCOMM connect() from userspace takes the same two locks the
other way round:</p>
<p>rfcomm_sock_connect()
    rfcomm_dlc_open()              [rfcomm_mutex]
      __rfcomm_dlc_open()
        rfcomm_session_create()
          kernel_connect()
            l2cap_sock_connect()
              l2cap_chan_connect() [hdev-&gt;lock]</p>
<p>WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  kworker/u131:1/1128 is trying to acquire lock:
  rfcomm_mutex, at: rfcomm_security_cfm+0x31/0x3e0 [rfcomm]
  but task is already holding lock:
  hci_cb_list_lock, at: hci_cc_read_enc_key_size+0x1d2/0xcc0
  Chain exists of:
    rfcomm_mutex --&gt; &amp;hdev-&gt;lock --&gt; hci_cb_list_lock</p>
<p>hci_auth_complete_evt() and hci_encrypt_change_evt() reach the callback
the same way.</p>
<p>Both orders have to be seen in the same boot, which is why a BR/EDR
connection alone is not enough to show it: a session set up by the
r…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-5rpp-jh2w-vm6p"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
