<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-24T21:37:14.503148+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98999</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-98999</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T21:37:14.504664+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>drm/xe: Fix stale pinned_link entry when fb-pin performs the final unpin</p>
<p>xe_bo_pin_external() and xe_bo_unpin_external() maintain the bo's
pinned_link list membership in xe-&gt;pinned.late.external, based on
whether the current call is the outermost pin or the final unpin.
However, the same external bo's pin_count can also be raised and
lowered directly by __xe_pin_fb_vma()/__xe_unpin_fb_vma(), which pin
the bo as a display scanout buffer without going through
xe_bo_pin_external()/xe_bo_unpin_external() at all, and have no
notion of, or ownership over, pinned_link.</p>
<p>If a bo is pinned both externally (e.g. dma-buf export) and as an fb,
and the external unpin happens first, xe_bo_unpin_external() correctly
observes pin_count &gt; 1 and leaves the bo on pinned_link. When the fb
unpin later performs the true last unpin (pin_count 1 -&gt; 0), it never
touches pinned_link, leaving the bo linked on xe-&gt;pinned.late.external
indefinitely. Once the bo is subsequently freed, this stale list entry
points into freed memory, corrupting the list and risking a
use-after-free the next time the list is walked or spliced.</p>
<p>The backup object pin/unpin sites in xe_bo_notifier_prepare_pinned()/
xe_bo_notifier_unprepare_pinned() have the same bypass characteristic,
though they never add their bo to a pinned list, so are not affected
by this particular list-corruption issue.</p>
<p>Move the pinned_link removal into xe_bo_account_unpin(), which…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98999"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-7j8x-2fgw-fvx8</id>
    <title>GHSA-7j8x-2fgw-fvx8</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T21:37:14.504848+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>drm/xe: Fix stale pinned_link entry when fb-pin performs the final unpin</p>
<p>xe_bo_pin_external() and xe_bo_unpin_external() maintain the bo's
pinned_link list membership in xe-&gt;pinned.late.external, based on
whether the current call is the outermost pin or the final unpin.
However, the same external bo's pin_count can also be raised and
lowered directly by __xe_pin_fb_vma()/__xe_unpin_fb_vma(), which pin
the bo as a display scanout buffer without going through
xe_bo_pin_external()/xe_bo_unpin_external() at all, and have no
notion of, or ownership over, pinned_link.</p>
<p>If a bo is pinned both externally (e.g. dma-buf export) and as an fb,
and the external unpin happens first, xe_bo_unpin_external() correctly
observes pin_count &gt; 1 and leaves the bo on pinned_link. When the fb
unpin later performs the true last unpin (pin_count 1 -&gt; 0), it never
touches pinned_link, leaving the bo linked on xe-&gt;pinned.late.external
indefinitely. Once the bo is subsequently freed, this stale list entry
points into freed memory, corrupting the list and risking a
use-after-free the next time the list is walked or spliced.</p>
<p>The backup object pin/unpin sites in xe_bo_notifier_prepare_pinned()/
xe_bo_notifier_unprepare_pinned() have the same bypass characteristic,
though they never add their bo to a pinned list, so are not affected
by this particular list-corruption issue.</p>
<p>Move the pinned_link removal into xe_bo_account_unpin(), which…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-7j8x-2fgw-fvx8"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
