<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-24T12:47:47.252856+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98975</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-98975</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T12:47:47.291014+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>xfs: stop exchanging reflink flags when exchanging mappings</p>
<p>When an exchange covers both files from offset 0 to i_disk_size,
xmi_can_exchange_reflink_flags() assumes every mapping moved and hands
the reflink flag over to the other file.</p>
<p>That assumption is wrong.  A file can still own shared blocks past
i_disk_size, e.g. after EXCHANGE_RANGE_TO_EOF sets a smaller size
without unmapping anything.  The flag is cleared anyway, and the next
write to such a block happens in place instead of CoW, corrupting the
other file that shares it.</p>
<p>Commit a23eca88448e ("xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing
issue with INO1_WRITTEN") fixed one instance of this.  Rather than add
another special case, stop moving the flags.
xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink() already sets the flag on both inodes
before the exchange, so both just keep it.</p>
<p>Nothing sets CLEAR_INO{1,2}_REFLINK anymore.  Intents logged by older
kernels may still carry them; recovery already masks them off, so they
stay in the log format mask and are ignored.</p>
<p>XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT has the same problem: it moves the reflink flag from
one inode to the other along with the extents.  Just removing that is
not enough here: the exchange path flags both inodes up front in
xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink(), but swapext has no such step, so the
inode receiving the shared extents would be left without the flag.
Set it on both inodes instead, and make sure both have a CoW fork,
si…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98975"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-pxhv-6mjw-34j3</id>
    <title>GHSA-pxhv-6mjw-34j3</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T12:47:47.291169+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>xfs: stop exchanging reflink flags when exchanging mappings</p>
<p>When an exchange covers both files from offset 0 to i_disk_size,
xmi_can_exchange_reflink_flags() assumes every mapping moved and hands
the reflink flag over to the other file.</p>
<p>That assumption is wrong.  A file can still own shared blocks past
i_disk_size, e.g. after EXCHANGE_RANGE_TO_EOF sets a smaller size
without unmapping anything.  The flag is cleared anyway, and the next
write to such a block happens in place instead of CoW, corrupting the
other file that shares it.</p>
<p>Commit a23eca88448e ("xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing
issue with INO1_WRITTEN") fixed one instance of this.  Rather than add
another special case, stop moving the flags.
xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink() already sets the flag on both inodes
before the exchange, so both just keep it.</p>
<p>Nothing sets CLEAR_INO{1,2}_REFLINK anymore.  Intents logged by older
kernels may still carry them; recovery already masks them off, so they
stay in the log format mask and are ignored.</p>
<p>XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT has the same problem: it moves the reflink flag from
one inode to the other along with the extents.  Just removing that is
not enough here: the exchange path flags both inodes up front in
xfs_exchmaps_ensure_reflink(), but swapext has no such step, so the
inode receiving the shared extents would be left without the flag.
Set it on both inodes instead, and make sure both have a CoW fork,
si…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-pxhv-6mjw-34j3"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98975</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98975 — xfs: stop exchanging reflink flags when exchanging mappings</title>
    <updated>2026-10-24T12:47:47.291227+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2026-98975</content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98975"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
