<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-27T09:41:12.607798+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98947</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-98947</title>
    <updated>2026-10-27T09:41:12.636354+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>vsock: Fix memory leak in vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb()</p>
<p>During the closure of a datagram socket, the vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb()
function may be called, which will add the packets
to the socket's backlog; then, after the receive queue is cleared,
the __release_sock() function will move the packet back from the socket's
backlog to the receive queue, which will lead to a memory leak.</p>
<p>sock_close
  __sock_release
    __vsock_release
      // take ownership by user-space
      lock_sock_nested
      sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)
      vmci_transport_release
                                      vmci_dispatch_dgs
                                        vmci_datagram_invoke_guest_handler
                                          vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb
                                            sk_receive_skb
                                              if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
                                                  [...]
                                         (!)  else if sk_add_backlog()
                                                  [...]
  (!) skb_queue_purge(&amp;sk-&gt;sk_receive_queue)</p>
<p>release_sock
        __release_sock
          // move all packets from the backlog
          // to the receive queue
   (!)    sk_backlog_rcv
            vsock_queue_rcv_skb
            [...]
              __sock_queue_rcv_skb
                if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
                  //…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98947"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-cf52-4qc8-h2h9</id>
    <title>GHSA-cf52-4qc8-h2h9</title>
    <updated>2026-10-27T09:41:12.636453+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>vsock: Fix memory leak in vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb()</p>
<p>During the closure of a datagram socket, the vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb()
function may be called, which will add the packets
to the socket's backlog; then, after the receive queue is cleared,
the __release_sock() function will move the packet back from the socket's
backlog to the receive queue, which will lead to a memory leak.</p>
<p>sock_close
  __sock_release
    __vsock_release
      // take ownership by user-space
      lock_sock_nested
      sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)
      vmci_transport_release
                                      vmci_dispatch_dgs
                                        vmci_datagram_invoke_guest_handler
                                          vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb
                                            sk_receive_skb
                                              if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
                                                  [...]
                                         (!)  else if sk_add_backlog()
                                                  [...]
  (!) skb_queue_purge(&amp;sk-&gt;sk_receive_queue)</p>
<p>release_sock
        __release_sock
          // move all packets from the backlog
          // to the receive queue
   (!)    sk_backlog_rcv
            vsock_queue_rcv_skb
            [...]
              __sock_queue_rcv_skb
                if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
                  //…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-cf52-4qc8-h2h9"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98947</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98947 — vsock: Fix memory leak in vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb()</title>
    <updated>2026-10-27T09:41:12.636494+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2026-98947</content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98947"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98947</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98947</title>
    <updated>2026-10-27T09:41:12.636515+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 257 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock: Fix memory leak in vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb() During the closure of a datagram socket, the vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb() function may be called, which will add the packets to the socket's backlog; then, after the receive queue is cleared, the __release_sock() function will move the packet back from the socket's backlog to the receive queue, which will lead to a memory leak. sock_close   __sock_release     __vsock_release       // take ownership by user-space       lock_sock_nested       sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)       vmci_transport_release                                       vmci_dispatch_dgs                                         vmci_datagram_invoke_guest_handler                                           vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb                                             sk_receive_skb                                               if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))                                                   [...]                                          (!)  else if sk_add_backlog()                                                   [...]   (!) skb_queue_purge(&amp;sk-&gt;sk_receive_queue)       release_sock         __release_sock           // move all packets from the backlog           // to the receive queue    (!)    sk_backlog_rcv             vsock_queue_rcv_skb             [...]               __sock_queue_rcv_skb                 if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))                   // Sinc…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98947"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
